Restaging the primary tumor in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after systemic therapy: a scoping review of the role of CT, FDG-PET, and CA19-9

OBJECTIVES: The introduction of improved multi-agent systemic therapies has made restaging and treatment response assessment in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) increasingly complex. This scoping review aims to assess and compare methods for local disease restaging and treatment response assessment in localized PDAC, with a focus on their association with resectability, overall survival (OS), and R0-resection rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This scoping review included studies on restaging in patients with PDAC following systemic therapy using CT and PET/CT from MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. RESULTS: F-FDG) PET/CT derived metabolic parameters, and resectability criteria. Dual-energy CT-derived extracellular volume (DECT-ECV) was evaluated as a baseline predictive biomarker. Associations between restaging methods and outcomes were reported inconsistently: some studies found significant associations for specific methods, whereas others did not. No restaging method showed a consistent association with both R0-resection and survival across all studies. CONCLUSION: Restaging of localized PDAC after systemic treatment remains challenging due to the limited accuracy of RECIST 1.1, particularly for the classifications partial response and stable disease. The current evidence suggests that integrating additional imaging features, alternative imaging modalities, and the biomarker carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 may improve the assessment of resectability and prognosis. These findings support a future version of RECIST 1.1 to alert clinicians to this issue. KEY POINTS: Question How effective are current (PET/)CT-based restaging methods in assessing local disease resectability and prognosis in localized PDAC after modern multi-agent systemic therapy? Findings Current restaging methods show inconsistent association with R0-resection and survival; RECIST 1.1 is particularly limited for the assessment of partial response and stable disease. Clinical relevance Current evidence confirms a need to integrate additional imaging features and the biomarker CA19-9, during restaging in patients with localized pancreatic cancer after modern systemic therapy to improve accuracy and reduce the risk of missed treatment options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12954-1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restaging the primary tumor in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after systemic therapy: a scoping review of the role of CT, FDG-PET, and CA19-9

H. A. Marquering, A. Malekzadeh, G. A. Zamboni, A. M. Lamoré et al.
European Radiology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Restaging the primary tumor in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after systemic therapy: a scoping review of the role of CT, FDG-PET, and CA19-9

H. A. Marquering, A. Malekzadeh, G. A. Zamboni, A. M. Lamoré, M. G. Besselink, M. E. Revheim, M. P. M. Kop, J. Stoker, I. M. Verpalen, M. Zins
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The introduction of improved multi-agent systemic therapies has made restaging and treatment response assessment in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) increasingly complex. This scoping review aims to assess and compare methods for local disease restaging and treatment response assessment in localized PDAC, with a focus on their association with resectability, overall survival (OS), and R0-resection rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This scoping review included studies on restaging in patients with PDAC following systemic therapy using CT and PET/CT from MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. RESULTS: F-FDG) PET/CT derived metabolic parameters, and resectability criteria. Dual-energy CT-derived extracellular volume (DECT-ECV) was evaluated as a baseline predictive biomarker. Associations between restaging methods and outcomes were reported inconsistently: some studies found significant associations for specific methods, whereas others did not. No restaging method showed a consistent association with both R0-resection and survival across all studies. CONCLUSION: Restaging of localized PDAC after systemic treatment remains challenging due to the limited accuracy of RECIST 1.1, particularly for the classifications partial response and stable disease. The current evidence suggests that integrating additional imaging features, alternative imaging modalities, and the biomarker carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 may improve the assessment of resectability and prognosis. These findings support a future version of RECIST 1.1 to alert clinicians to this issue. KEY POINTS: Question How effective are current (PET/)CT-based restaging methods in assessing local disease resectability and prognosis in localized PDAC after modern multi-agent systemic therapy? Findings Current restaging methods show inconsistent association with R0-resection and survival; RECIST 1.1 is particularly limited for the assessment of partial response and stable disease. Clinical relevance Current evidence confirms a need to integrate additional imaging features and the biomarker CA19-9, during restaging in patients with localized pancreatic cancer after modern systemic therapy to improve accuracy and reduce the risk of missed treatment options.

European Radiology
University of Verona (IT), Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph (FR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Hanarth Fonds
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.