Ocular surface outcomes after upper-eyelid–sparing management of large lower-eyelid tumor defects

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term ocular surface outcomes after upper-eyelid-sparing management of large lower-eyelid defects. METHODS: = 1). The operated eye was compared with the contralateral, non-operated eye. Assessments included the Dry Eye Questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5), margin- reflex distance (MRD) 1 and 2, tear break-up time (TBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), ocular staining score (OSS), and infrared meibography. RESULTS: No significant differences in TBUT or TMH were observed between operated and contralateral eyes, suggesting preserved tear film stability and tear volume despite lower-eyelid gland loss. Lower-eyelid meibography demonstrated a significant reduction in meibomian gland area in operated eyes, reflecting gland excision during tumor removal. Operated eyes showed significantly higher MRD2, DEQ-5 scores and OSSs, indicating greater exposure, subjective dry-eye symptoms, and ocular surface involvement. CONCLUSION: Upper-eyelid-sparing management of large lower-eyelid defects preserves tear film stability on long-term follow-up but is associated with increased dry-eye symptoms and ocular surface staining. Thus, preservation of the upper eyelid and its meibomian glands appears sufficient to maintain functional tear film integrity despite substantial lower-eyelid gland loss, providing guidance for surgical decision-making to minimize postoperative ocular surface morbidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orbit
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2026.2743829
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ocular surface outcomes after upper-eyelid–sparing management of large lower-eyelid tumor defects

Elin Bohman, Rafi Sheikh, Malin Malmsjö, Jens Nääv Ottosson et al.
Orbit
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
article

Ocular surface outcomes after upper-eyelid–sparing management of large lower-eyelid tumor defects

Elin Bohman, Rafi Sheikh, Malin Malmsjö, Jens Nääv Ottosson, Johanna Berggren, Adrianna Edgren
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term ocular surface outcomes after upper-eyelid-sparing management of large lower-eyelid defects. METHODS: = 1). The operated eye was compared with the contralateral, non-operated eye. Assessments included the Dry Eye Questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5), margin- reflex distance (MRD) 1 and 2, tear break-up time (TBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), ocular staining score (OSS), and infrared meibography. RESULTS: No significant differences in TBUT or TMH were observed between operated and contralateral eyes, suggesting preserved tear film stability and tear volume despite lower-eyelid gland loss. Lower-eyelid meibography demonstrated a significant reduction in meibomian gland area in operated eyes, reflecting gland excision during tumor removal. Operated eyes showed significantly higher MRD2, DEQ-5 scores and OSSs, indicating greater exposure, subjective dry-eye symptoms, and ocular surface involvement. CONCLUSION: Upper-eyelid-sparing management of large lower-eyelid defects preserves tear film stability on long-term follow-up but is associated with increased dry-eye symptoms and ocular surface staining. Thus, preservation of the upper eyelid and its meibomian glands appears sufficient to maintain functional tear film integrity despite substantial lower-eyelid gland loss, providing guidance for surgical decision-making to minimize postoperative ocular surface morbidity.

Orbit
Lund University (SE), S:t Eriks Ögonsjukhus (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Stichting voor de Blinden, Ögonfonden, Swedish Cancer Foundation, Lunds Universitet, Karolinska Institutet, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet, Fru Berta Kamprads Stiftelse, Science for Life Laboratory, Skånes universitetssjukhus
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.