Governing Large Language Model Services for Confidential Microdata: A Decision Framework for National Statistical Offices

National statistical offices increasingly face requests to provide large language model (LLM) capabilities in secure research environments. The governance problem is to determine which service configurations, if any, can be supported safely on confidential microdata. These services challenge traditional statistical disclosure control because interaction is adaptive, systems may retrieve documents or call analytical tools, and outputs may appear plausible without being grounded in approved data. This paper proposes a governance framework that organizes each request as a sequence of decisions: whether an LLM is needed, which service mode is justified, which threat model applies, which controls are required, and what evidence must be reviewed before release. The framework spans deterministic pipelines, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), tool-using agents, code-execution agents, linkage configurations, and fine-tuning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Official Statistics
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0282423x261489965
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing Large Language Model Services for Confidential Microdata: A Decision Framework for National Statistical Offices

Mohammed Haddou, Saeid Molladavoudi, Hanan Ather
Journal of Official Statistics
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Governing Large Language Model Services for Confidential Microdata: A Decision Framework for National Statistical Offices

Mohammed Haddou, Saeid Molladavoudi, Hanan Ather
article en

Abstract

National statistical offices increasingly face requests to provide large language model (LLM) capabilities in secure research environments. The governance problem is to determine which service configurations, if any, can be supported safely on confidential microdata. These services challenge traditional statistical disclosure control because interaction is adaptive, systems may retrieve documents or call analytical tools, and outputs may appear plausible without being grounded in approved data. This paper proposes a governance framework that organizes each request as a sequence of decisions: whether an LLM is needed, which service mode is justified, which threat model applies, which controls are required, and what evidence must be reviewed before release. The framework spans deterministic pipelines, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), tool-using agents, code-execution agents, linkage configurations, and fine-tuning.

Journal of Official Statistics
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.