Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spouse response inventory in individuals with chronic pain

Chronic pain is a significant global health challenge. Spousal responses to pain behaviors substantially influence patients’ pain perception and psychological adjustment. Therefore, the Spouse Response Inventory (SRI) was developed based on the operant behavioral framework to assess the spouse responses of individuals with chronic pain. To assess this construct in Chinese populations, we translated and culturally adapted the scale into Chinese. In our study, the SRI was translated and culturally adapted using Brislin’s model. A pilot test was first conducted, followed by a formal investigation from December 2025 to January 2026. A total of 517 chronic pain patients from a tertiary hospital in Henan, China, were recruited via convenience sampling. To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese SRI, several statistical methods were employed: content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI); construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), with model fit evaluated using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI); convergent validity was assessed using composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE); Cronbach’s α measured internal consistency; and item analysis was performed using the critical ratio (CR) method and item-total correlation. The Chinese SRI consists of 33 items across four subscales. The item-level CVI ranged from 0.875 to 1, and the scale-level CVI was 0.97. CFA showed standardized factor loadings from 0.586 to 0.882 (all P < 0.001). CR ranged from 0.866 to 0.941, and AVE from 0.472 to 0.644. The four-factor model fit was acceptable (RMSEA = 0.064, CFI = 0.894). Item-total correlations ranged from 0.278 to 0.685. Cronbach’s α for the total scale was 0.934, and for subscales, 0.862–0.941. The Chinese SRI may be considered a suitable tool for assessing spousal responses in individuals with Chronic Pain in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-74817-5
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spouse response inventory in individuals with chronic pain

夏令杰, Ge Yang, Rong Tao, Yu Wang et al.
Scientific Reports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spouse response inventory in individuals with chronic pain

夏令杰, Ge Yang, Rong Tao, Yu Wang, Enshe Jiang, Hongying Jia
article en

Abstract

Chronic pain is a significant global health challenge. Spousal responses to pain behaviors substantially influence patients’ pain perception and psychological adjustment. Therefore, the Spouse Response Inventory (SRI) was developed based on the operant behavioral framework to assess the spouse responses of individuals with chronic pain. To assess this construct in Chinese populations, we translated and culturally adapted the scale into Chinese. In our study, the SRI was translated and culturally adapted using Brislin’s model. A pilot test was first conducted, followed by a formal investigation from December 2025 to January 2026. A total of 517 chronic pain patients from a tertiary hospital in Henan, China, were recruited via convenience sampling. To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese SRI, several statistical methods were employed: content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI); construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), with model fit evaluated using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI); convergent validity was assessed using composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE); Cronbach’s α measured internal consistency; and item analysis was performed using the critical ratio (CR) method and item-total correlation. The Chinese SRI consists of 33 items across four subscales. The item-level CVI ranged from 0.875 to 1, and the scale-level CVI was 0.97. CFA showed standardized factor loadings from 0.586 to 0.882 (all P < 0.001). CR ranged from 0.866 to 0.941, and AVE from 0.472 to 0.644. The four-factor model fit was acceptable (RMSEA = 0.064, CFI = 0.894). Item-total correlations ranged from 0.278 to 0.685. Cronbach’s α for the total scale was 0.934, and for subscales, 0.862–0.941. The Chinese SRI may be considered a suitable tool for assessing spousal responses in individuals with Chronic Pain in China.

Scientific Reports
Henan University (CN), Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.