The time is now: Why talking to our children about injustice cannot wait

In this article, I argue that white parents have an obligation to have early conversations with their children about racial injustice. First, I appeal to combined considerations of fairness and solidarity. It is unfair that racial injustice exists, that Black parents cannot shield their children from knowledge of that injustice, and that acquiring that knowledge is more painful for Black children. This gives white parents solidarity-based reasons to have early injustice conversations, as a way of engaging in fate sharing with Black parents and of developing their own commitments to racial justice. Second, I argue that early conversations are required to allow white children to fulfill short-term duties to avoid causing unjust harm, avoid risking unjust harm, and stand up against injustice. Finally, I argue that beginning with conversations about justice and saving conversations about injustice for later makes it harder for children to fulfill long-term duties of justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217261495290
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The time is now: Why talking to our children about injustice cannot wait

Rosa Terlazzo
Political Studies
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

The time is now: Why talking to our children about injustice cannot wait

Rosa Terlazzo
article en

Abstract

In this article, I argue that white parents have an obligation to have early conversations with their children about racial injustice. First, I appeal to combined considerations of fairness and solidarity. It is unfair that racial injustice exists, that Black parents cannot shield their children from knowledge of that injustice, and that acquiring that knowledge is more painful for Black children. This gives white parents solidarity-based reasons to have early injustice conversations, as a way of engaging in fate sharing with Black parents and of developing their own commitments to racial justice. Second, I argue that early conversations are required to allow white children to fulfill short-term duties to avoid causing unjust harm, avoid risking unjust harm, and stand up against injustice. Finally, I argue that beginning with conversations about justice and saving conversations about injustice for later makes it harder for children to fulfill long-term duties of justice.

Political Studies
University of Rochester (US)
University at Buffalo
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.