Development and Internal Validation of the MELD–ERT Score for Mortality Risk Stratification After Liver Transplantation

Background/Objectives: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reflects pretransplant disease severity, but does not capture intraoperative factors that may influence post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a composite MELD–erythrocyte transfusion (ERT) score for mortality risk stratification after liver transplantation (LT). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 125 adult LT recipients between August 2024 and July 2026. A MELD–ERT score (0–2) was constructed using ROC-derived cut-offs for MELD and intraoperative ERT. Prognostic performance for mortality and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using regression, conventional and time-dependent ROC and survival analyses, with bootstrap internal validation. Results: During a median follow-up of 544 days, 30 patients (24.0%) died. MELD and ERT were independently associated with mortality. Mortality increased stepwise across MELD–ERT scores of 0, 1, and 2 (0%, 36.2%, and 59.1%, respectively). The MELD–ERT score showed good discrimination (AUC 0.836, 95% CI 0.776–0.897), with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.818 after bootstrap validation. Its discrimination was comparable to MELD alone (p = 0.660) and superior to ERT alone (p = 0.002). Time-dependent AUCs for MELD–ERT were 0.893, 0.930, 0.837, and 0.812 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. OS differed significantly across score categories (log-rank p < 0.001), and high-risk patients had a 9.7-month shorter 24-month RMST (95% CI 5.4–14.3; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MELD–ERT score provides a simple approach to post-LT mortality risk stratification and demonstrated good discrimination after internal validation. However, it did not significantly outperform MELD alone. External validation is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15207903
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Internal Validation of the MELD–ERT Score for Mortality Risk Stratification After Liver Transplantation

Bartu Çetin, Murat Zeytunlu
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Development and Internal Validation of the MELD–ERT Score for Mortality Risk Stratification After Liver Transplantation

Bartu Çetin, Murat Zeytunlu
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reflects pretransplant disease severity, but does not capture intraoperative factors that may influence post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a composite MELD–erythrocyte transfusion (ERT) score for mortality risk stratification after liver transplantation (LT). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 125 adult LT recipients between August 2024 and July 2026. A MELD–ERT score (0–2) was constructed using ROC-derived cut-offs for MELD and intraoperative ERT. Prognostic performance for mortality and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using regression, conventional and time-dependent ROC and survival analyses, with bootstrap internal validation. Results: During a median follow-up of 544 days, 30 patients (24.0%) died. MELD and ERT were independently associated with mortality. Mortality increased stepwise across MELD–ERT scores of 0, 1, and 2 (0%, 36.2%, and 59.1%, respectively). The MELD–ERT score showed good discrimination (AUC 0.836, 95% CI 0.776–0.897), with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.818 after bootstrap validation. Its discrimination was comparable to MELD alone (p = 0.660) and superior to ERT alone (p = 0.002). Time-dependent AUCs for MELD–ERT were 0.893, 0.930, 0.837, and 0.812 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. OS differed significantly across score categories (log-rank p < 0.001), and high-risk patients had a 9.7-month shorter 24-month RMST (95% CI 5.4–14.3; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MELD–ERT score provides a simple approach to post-LT mortality risk stratification and demonstrated good discrimination after internal validation. However, it did not significantly outperform MELD alone. External validation is warranted.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(20)
Izmir University (TR), İzmir University of Economics (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.