A roadmap for modernizing vaccine safety assessment: Challenges and opportunities for new approach methodologies

Vaccines are administered to large populations of healthy individuals, including vulnerable groups, making an exceptionally rigorous safety profile a prerequisite for their approval and use. Nonclinical vaccine safety assessment has traditionally relied on standardized animal testing methodologies, which face increasing challenges: the ethical imperative to reduce animal use, the need for faster vaccine development, and the limitations of animal models in predicting human-specific immune responses. The advent of modern vaccine platforms such as mRNA technologies and viral-vector vaccines necessitates a re-evaluation of safety frameworks. This article explores emerging strat­egies to modernize vaccine safety assessment, integrating new approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro systems, artificial intelligence, and adverse outcome pathways (AOPs). Ethical refinements to animal husbandry practices, including group housing, humane endpoints, pain man­agement and scaled blood sampling volumes, are also discussed to align with the principles of the 3Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement). The adoption of molecular and omics-based techniques, along with innovative validation strategies, offers opportunities to improve predictive accuracy and mechanistic insight. The article highlights a strategic framework for implementing NAMs across the three stages at which animals are still used – early screening, late nonclinical development, and batch release – while ensuring alignment with regulatory requirements. Implementation must be careful enough to ensure that the use of NAMs in the safety evaluation of vaccines maintains or exceeds current safety assessment standards. By addressing scientific, ethical, and regulatory challenges, NAMs have the potential to transform vaccine safety assessment, enhancing human relevance and accelerating innovation in vaccine development. Plain language summaryThis article examines the evolving landscape of vaccine safety assessment, focusing on opportunities to modernize testing approaches through new approach methodologies (NAMs). Drawing on recent discussions with stakeholders across industry, academia, and regulatory bodies, we outline key chal­lenges and strategic pathways for implementing NAMs in vaccine development while maintaining robust safety standards. Special attention is given to emerging technologies, such as human-relevant test systems, artificial intelligence, and virtual control groups, to the replacement of animal-based potency, pyrogen and adventitious agent tests used for batch release, and to considerations for regu­latory acceptance and implementation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ALTEX
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2608271
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A roadmap for modernizing vaccine safety assessment: Challenges and opportunities for new approach methodologies

Robin Levis, Paul Désert, Marco Cavaleri, Claudia Wrzesinski et al.
ALTEX
Animal testing and alternatives
article

A roadmap for modernizing vaccine safety assessment: Challenges and opportunities for new approach methodologies

Robin Levis, Paul Désert, Marco Cavaleri, Claudia Wrzesinski, Thomas Hartung, Fenna Sillé
article en

Abstract

Vaccines are administered to large populations of healthy individuals, including vulnerable groups, making an exceptionally rigorous safety profile a prerequisite for their approval and use. Nonclinical vaccine safety assessment has traditionally relied on standardized animal testing methodologies, which face increasing challenges: the ethical imperative to reduce animal use, the need for faster vaccine development, and the limitations of animal models in predicting human-specific immune responses. The advent of modern vaccine platforms such as mRNA technologies and viral-vector vaccines necessitates a re-evaluation of safety frameworks. This article explores emerging strat­egies to modernize vaccine safety assessment, integrating new approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro systems, artificial intelligence, and adverse outcome pathways (AOPs). Ethical refinements to animal husbandry practices, including group housing, humane endpoints, pain man­agement and scaled blood sampling volumes, are also discussed to align with the principles of the 3Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement). The adoption of molecular and omics-based techniques, along with innovative validation strategies, offers opportunities to improve predictive accuracy and mechanistic insight. The article highlights a strategic framework for implementing NAMs across the three stages at which animals are still used – early screening, late nonclinical development, and batch release – while ensuring alignment with regulatory requirements. Implementation must be careful enough to ensure that the use of NAMs in the safety evaluation of vaccines maintains or exceeds current safety assessment standards. By addressing scientific, ethical, and regulatory challenges, NAMs have the potential to transform vaccine safety assessment, enhancing human relevance and accelerating innovation in vaccine development. Plain language summaryThis article examines the evolving landscape of vaccine safety assessment, focusing on opportunities to modernize testing approaches through new approach methodologies (NAMs). Drawing on recent discussions with stakeholders across industry, academia, and regulatory bodies, we outline key chal­lenges and strategic pathways for implementing NAMs in vaccine development while maintaining robust safety standards. Special attention is given to emerging technologies, such as human-relevant test systems, artificial intelligence, and virtual control groups, to the replacement of animal-based potency, pyrogen and adventitious agent tests used for batch release, and to considerations for regu­latory acceptance and implementation strategies.

ALTEXVol. 43(4)
European Medicines Agency (NL), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Sanofi (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.