Laboratory conditions matter: social housing in male and female laboratory mice in a multicenter study approach

Despite numerous studies and literature reviews, the social housing of laboratory mice is still under debate. Aggression and social stress can lead to physiological and behavioral alterations, especially in male mice, whereas single housing is a potential source of discomfort, particularly in female mice. This multicenter study aimed to assess the impact of single versus group housing on severity in both sexes and to examine whether a general recommendation could be made. C57BL/6NRj mice from the same litters of a commercial breeder were housed either singly or in groups of four across four different laboratory sites. Here we assessed fecal corticosterone metabolite concentration, aggressive behavior, wound scores and observed behavioral readouts on locomotion, stress coping in the forced swim test, burrowing, nesting and anxiety. Differences due to social housing conditions were not very pronounced. Instead, we found that, despite harmonization efforts, the differences in outcomes across the four laboratory sites were substantial. Furthermore, the individuality of the mice appears to have an additional influence on the results. These findings suggest that optimal housing is not generalizable but depends on the specific laboratory conditions. Beyond meeting the minimum housing standards as set by legislation, we should actively embrace refinement as a guiding principle and strive to create housing conditions that not only meet scientific needs but also continuously improve the welfare of the animals entrusted to our care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lab Animal
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-026-01805-7
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laboratory conditions matter: social housing in male and female laboratory mice in a multicenter study approach

Sabine Chourbaji, Tolba Rene, Verena Buchecker, Peter Gass et al.
Lab Animal
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Laboratory conditions matter: social housing in male and female laboratory mice in a multicenter study approach

Sabine Chourbaji, Tolba Rene, Verena Buchecker, Peter Gass, Christiane Brandwein, Heidrun Potschka, Miriam Annika Vogt, Anne Stephanie Mallien, Rupert Palme, Anne Rix, Steven Roger Talbot, Jasmin Baier, André Bleich, Natascha Pfeiffer, Fabian Kiessling, Anna Munk, Renee Girbig, Laura Becker, Sarah Neunecker, Monika Franz
article en

Abstract

Despite numerous studies and literature reviews, the social housing of laboratory mice is still under debate. Aggression and social stress can lead to physiological and behavioral alterations, especially in male mice, whereas single housing is a potential source of discomfort, particularly in female mice. This multicenter study aimed to assess the impact of single versus group housing on severity in both sexes and to examine whether a general recommendation could be made. C57BL/6NRj mice from the same litters of a commercial breeder were housed either singly or in groups of four across four different laboratory sites. Here we assessed fecal corticosterone metabolite concentration, aggressive behavior, wound scores and observed behavioral readouts on locomotion, stress coping in the forced swim test, burrowing, nesting and anxiety. Differences due to social housing conditions were not very pronounced. Instead, we found that, despite harmonization efforts, the differences in outcomes across the four laboratory sites were substantial. Furthermore, the individuality of the mice appears to have an additional influence on the results. These findings suggest that optimal housing is not generalizable but depends on the specific laboratory conditions. Beyond meeting the minimum housing standards as set by legislation, we should actively embrace refinement as a guiding principle and strive to create housing conditions that not only meet scientific needs but also continuously improve the welfare of the animals entrusted to our care.

Lab Animal
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Central Institute of Mental Health (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.