Bridging climate science and adaptation: A perspective on the construction of national climate scenarios

In many countries, National Climate Scenarios or Projections have become foundational components of national climate services, providing authoritative, science-based, locally tailored information to support climate-sensitive planning and policy. Drawing on the experiences of ten countries, this paper synthesizes current practices and identifies shared challenges in developing scientifically credible and decision-relevant climate information. Despite substantial progress, gaps persist between what users request and what climate scientists can deliver, reflecting limits in observations, models, methods, capacity, and the inherent uncertainties of weather and future climate change. Developments in climate science, including advances in (global) convection-permitting modelling, artificial intelligence and machine learning-based methods, and new generations of CMIP/CORDEX, together with expanding societal expectations, create both opportunities and dilemmas for updating and maintaining scenario products at a national scale. We highlight five outstanding questions: how to co-develop useful and credible products with diverse users; how to represent and communicate uncertainty at the science–policy interface; how to combine multiple lines of evidence across models, scales, and methods; how to integrate information on extreme events and low-likelihood, high-impact climate outcomes; and where national approaches should converge or remain nation-specific. Addressing these questions requires progress in, and collaboration between, physical climate science, the emerging science of climate services, and the social sciences. By strengthening user engagement, refining approaches to uncertainty, and expanding international collaboration to reduce duplication and raise standards, future National Climate Scenario services can provide a stronger foundation for climate information, risk assessment, adaptation planning, and associated policy processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Meteorological Society.
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2026.100052
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging climate science and adaptation: A perspective on the construction of national climate scenarios

Regula Muelchi, Frank Selten, C. McSweeney, Mark Payne et al.
Journal of the European Meteorological Society.
Climate variability and models
article

Bridging climate science and adaptation: A perspective on the construction of national climate scenarios

Regula Muelchi, Frank Selten, C. McSweeney, Mark Payne, Piet Termonia, Gustav Strandberg, Geert Lenderink, Steven Caluwaerts, Frank Kreienkamp, Markus Todt, Fei Luo, Hylke de Vries, Theresa Schellander‐Gorgas, Janette Bessembinder, Karin van der Wiel, Kobe Vandelanotte, Claire Scannell
article en

Abstract

In many countries, National Climate Scenarios or Projections have become foundational components of national climate services, providing authoritative, science-based, locally tailored information to support climate-sensitive planning and policy. Drawing on the experiences of ten countries, this paper synthesizes current practices and identifies shared challenges in developing scientifically credible and decision-relevant climate information. Despite substantial progress, gaps persist between what users request and what climate scientists can deliver, reflecting limits in observations, models, methods, capacity, and the inherent uncertainties of weather and future climate change. Developments in climate science, including advances in (global) convection-permitting modelling, artificial intelligence and machine learning-based methods, and new generations of CMIP/CORDEX, together with expanding societal expectations, create both opportunities and dilemmas for updating and maintaining scenario products at a national scale. We highlight five outstanding questions: how to co-develop useful and credible products with diverse users; how to represent and communicate uncertainty at the science–policy interface; how to combine multiple lines of evidence across models, scales, and methods; how to integrate information on extreme events and low-likelihood, high-impact climate outcomes; and where national approaches should converge or remain nation-specific. Addressing these questions requires progress in, and collaboration between, physical climate science, the emerging science of climate services, and the social sciences. By strengthening user engagement, refining approaches to uncertainty, and expanding international collaboration to reduce duplication and raise standards, future National Climate Scenario services can provide a stronger foundation for climate information, risk assessment, adaptation planning, and associated policy processes.

Journal of the European Meteorological Society.Vol. 5
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (BE), Met Office (GB), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL), Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss (CH), Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE), Ghent University (BE), Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Met Éireann (IE), Meteorological Service Singapore (SG), GeoSphere Austria
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.