The effect of sequential antiresorptive therapy after denosumab discontinuation on fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Discontinuation of denosumab (DMAb) causes a rapid rebound in bone turnover and increases the risk of multiple vertebral fractures. However, the optimal sequential antiresorptive strategy and its specific timing remain uncertain. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through September 2025 for primary randomized controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating fracture outcomes after DMAb withdrawal. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a random-effects model, and subgroup analyses were performed according to sequential agent, timing of initiation, DMAb exposure duration, and study design. Results Nine studies involving 1886 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sequential antiresorptive therapy significantly reduced the risk of rebound-associated vertebral fractures compared with control or delayed treatment (pooled RR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.34–0.75; I² = 20.2%). Early initiation (≤ 3 months after the last DMAb dose) suggested a trend toward greater benefit (RR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.18–0.57), whereas delayed transition lost statistical significance (RR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.38–1.14), although the test for subgroup interaction did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.07). Intravenous zoledronic acid provided the most consistent protection, whereas oral alendronate demonstrated a trend toward fracture risk reduction that did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Sequential bisphosphonate therapy, particularly potent agents such as intravenous zoledronic acid, with a suggested benefit when administered early (≤ 3 months) after DMAb cessation—substantially mitigates rebound-associated vertebral fracture risk. Proactive transition planning must be considered an integral component of denosumab therapy to preserve skeletal gains and prevent avoidable fractures. (PROSPERO registration Number: CRD420251166058)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-10435-6
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of sequential antiresorptive therapy after denosumab discontinuation on fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiang Yao, Xuan Tang, Liujie Weng, Han Miao et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

The effect of sequential antiresorptive therapy after denosumab discontinuation on fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiang Yao, Xuan Tang, Liujie Weng, Han Miao, Qiwen Bao, Xiangzheng Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Discontinuation of denosumab (DMAb) causes a rapid rebound in bone turnover and increases the risk of multiple vertebral fractures. However, the optimal sequential antiresorptive strategy and its specific timing remain uncertain. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through September 2025 for primary randomized controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating fracture outcomes after DMAb withdrawal. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a random-effects model, and subgroup analyses were performed according to sequential agent, timing of initiation, DMAb exposure duration, and study design. Results Nine studies involving 1886 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sequential antiresorptive therapy significantly reduced the risk of rebound-associated vertebral fractures compared with control or delayed treatment (pooled RR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.34–0.75; I² = 20.2%). Early initiation (≤ 3 months after the last DMAb dose) suggested a trend toward greater benefit (RR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.18–0.57), whereas delayed transition lost statistical significance (RR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.38–1.14), although the test for subgroup interaction did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.07). Intravenous zoledronic acid provided the most consistent protection, whereas oral alendronate demonstrated a trend toward fracture risk reduction that did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Sequential bisphosphonate therapy, particularly potent agents such as intravenous zoledronic acid, with a suggested benefit when administered early (≤ 3 months) after DMAb cessation—substantially mitigates rebound-associated vertebral fracture risk. Proactive transition planning must be considered an integral component of denosumab therapy to preserve skeletal gains and prevent avoidable fractures. (PROSPERO registration Number: CRD420251166058)

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Jiangsu University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.