Optimizing grassland biodiversity and carbon co-benefits under climate change: An integrated climate-ecological-economic modelling framework

Managing grasslands for both carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation is increasingly challenging under climate change. We develop an integrated climate–ecological–economic modelling framework to evaluate biodiversity–carbon trade-offs in the Inner Mongolian typical steppe, where mowing and grazing are dominant management practices. Using butterflies as biodiversity indicators, carbon-sequestration estimates, regional opportunity-cost parameters, and downscaled climate projections under SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, and SSP5–8.5, we applied the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to identify Pareto-optimal mowing–grazing configurations from 2025 to 2050. The simulations indicated that, within the parameterized water-limited response functions, projected precipitation differences were associated with larger shifts in biodiversity–carbon co-management potential than temperature differences. Under the assumptions of our modelling framework, optimized configurations were generally mowing-dominated, with mowing accounting for 77%–94% of the management-allocation matrix in representative 2030 solutions, although grazing-oriented patches remained important in biodiversity-priority outcomes by maintaining habitat heterogeneity. Opportunity-cost accounting provided a regional economic comparison layer for Pareto-optimal configurations, with temporal cost increases mainly reflecting the assumed annual escalation and cross-scenario differences reflecting the cost ranges of feasible Pareto-optimal solutions. Overall, the framework provides a transferable approach for linking climate scenarios, land-use allocation, ecological outcomes, and economic constraints in grassland biodiversity–carbon co-management, subject to recalibration with local ecological, management, and economic parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108368
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing grassland biodiversity and carbon co-benefits under climate change: An integrated climate-ecological-economic modelling framework

Rong‐Gang Cong, Wenying Han, Apostolos Kyriazopoulos, Xin Zhang et al.
Land Use Policy
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Optimizing grassland biodiversity and carbon co-benefits under climate change: An integrated climate-ecological-economic modelling framework

Rong‐Gang Cong, Wenying Han, Apostolos Kyriazopoulos, Xin Zhang, Henrik G. Smith
article en

Abstract

Managing grasslands for both carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation is increasingly challenging under climate change. We develop an integrated climate–ecological–economic modelling framework to evaluate biodiversity–carbon trade-offs in the Inner Mongolian typical steppe, where mowing and grazing are dominant management practices. Using butterflies as biodiversity indicators, carbon-sequestration estimates, regional opportunity-cost parameters, and downscaled climate projections under SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, and SSP5–8.5, we applied the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to identify Pareto-optimal mowing–grazing configurations from 2025 to 2050. The simulations indicated that, within the parameterized water-limited response functions, projected precipitation differences were associated with larger shifts in biodiversity–carbon co-management potential than temperature differences. Under the assumptions of our modelling framework, optimized configurations were generally mowing-dominated, with mowing accounting for 77%–94% of the management-allocation matrix in representative 2030 solutions, although grazing-oriented patches remained important in biodiversity-priority outcomes by maintaining habitat heterogeneity. Opportunity-cost accounting provided a regional economic comparison layer for Pareto-optimal configurations, with temporal cost increases mainly reflecting the assumed annual escalation and cross-scenario differences reflecting the cost ranges of feasible Pareto-optimal solutions. Overall, the framework provides a transferable approach for linking climate scenarios, land-use allocation, ecological outcomes, and economic constraints in grassland biodiversity–carbon co-management, subject to recalibration with local ecological, management, and economic parameters.

Land Use PolicyVol. 172
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Democritus University of Thrace (GR), Lund University (SE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.