Charting the future: A multi-setting medical chart study of advance care planning in Parkinson's disease and atypical Parkinsonism

BackgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) enables people with progressive diseases to document and communicate future treatment preferences. For Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP), ACP is particularly important because of disease complexity, symptom burden, the progressive nature of the disease, and cognitive decline, yet its implementation across care settings remains unclear.MethodsWe conducted a medical chart review of 189 deceased patients with PD or AP who died in nursing homes (n = 91), hospitals (n = 58), or at home (n = 40) in the Netherlands. For patients who died at home, data were obtained from their general practice records. Data on treatment preferences, care discussions and palliative care goals were extracted at one year and six weeks before death.ResultsDocumentation of treatment preferences increased towards death but differed markedly between settings. Nursing homes recorded resuscitation and ICU limitations early and comprehensively, whereas hospitals made major updates only in the final weeks of life. In general practices, ACP documentation was limited. Nursing homes and hospitals more frequently addressed disease-specific scenarios, palliative sedation and end-of-life issues, while general practices more often reported preferred place of death and euthanasia. Palliative care goals in nursing homes covered all domains, while in hospitals and general practices they mainly related to physical aspects.ConclusionACP remains inconsistently documented and frequently delayed until the final weeks of life, when crises or cognitive decline may hinder meaningful participation. Earlier, iterative ACP-supported by clinician training, PD-specific guidance, and system-level measures such as ACP prompts in electronic medical records-could foster a more proactive and person-centered palliative approach aligned with patient values throughout the disease trajectory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Parkinson s Disease
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1877718x261495736
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charting the future: A multi-setting medical chart study of advance care planning in Parkinson's disease and atypical Parkinsonism

Herma H. Lennaerts, Bauke W. Dijkstra, Marjan J. Meinders, Jenny Theodora van der Steen et al.
Journal of Parkinson s Disease
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Charting the future: A multi-setting medical chart study of advance care planning in Parkinson's disease and atypical Parkinsonism

Herma H. Lennaerts, Bauke W. Dijkstra, Marjan J. Meinders, Jenny Theodora van der Steen, Anke Elbers, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Marieke C. Groot
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) enables people with progressive diseases to document and communicate future treatment preferences. For Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP), ACP is particularly important because of disease complexity, symptom burden, the progressive nature of the disease, and cognitive decline, yet its implementation across care settings remains unclear.MethodsWe conducted a medical chart review of 189 deceased patients with PD or AP who died in nursing homes (n = 91), hospitals (n = 58), or at home (n = 40) in the Netherlands. For patients who died at home, data were obtained from their general practice records. Data on treatment preferences, care discussions and palliative care goals were extracted at one year and six weeks before death.ResultsDocumentation of treatment preferences increased towards death but differed markedly between settings. Nursing homes recorded resuscitation and ICU limitations early and comprehensively, whereas hospitals made major updates only in the final weeks of life. In general practices, ACP documentation was limited. Nursing homes and hospitals more frequently addressed disease-specific scenarios, palliative sedation and end-of-life issues, while general practices more often reported preferred place of death and euthanasia. Palliative care goals in nursing homes covered all domains, while in hospitals and general practices they mainly related to physical aspects.ConclusionACP remains inconsistently documented and frequently delayed until the final weeks of life, when crises or cognitive decline may hinder meaningful participation. Earlier, iterative ACP-supported by clinician training, PD-specific guidance, and system-level measures such as ACP prompts in electronic medical records-could foster a more proactive and person-centered palliative approach aligned with patient values throughout the disease trajectory.

Journal of Parkinson s Disease
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), King's College London (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.