Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-center randomized controlled trial

Multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia is standard in urological surgery, and there is additional interest in eliminating intraoperative opioids in prostate cancer surgery. Randomized evidence for opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is lacking. In this single-center randomized controlled trial, adult men undergoing RARP were allocated 1:1 to OFA (dexmedetomidine plus ketamine, no intraoperative opioids) or a remifentanil-based technique. Both groups received identical multimodal premedication, a bilateral quadratus lumborum block, sevoflurane maintenance and identical oxycodone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was cumulative PCA oxycodone consumption over the first 24 postoperative hours. Prespecified secondary outcomes were pain (NRS), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), the demanded-to-delivered PCA bolus ratio, and perioperative changes in serum creatinine and white-cell count. A total of 149 patients were analyzed (OFA n=75, opioid-based n=74). Cumulative 24-h oxycodone consumption was lower with OFA (median 12.0 mg [interquartile range, IQR 6.0-22.0] vs 19.0 mg [10.5-34.0]; p=0.001), with a Hodges-Lehmann location-shift estimate of -6.0 mg (95% confidence interval, CI -10.0 to -2.0). Pain scores did not differ at any time point, and PONV was infrequent, with no significant between-group difference. Intraoperative hemodynamic adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension), perioperative white-cell count and serum creatinine did not differ between groups. In RARP delivered on a standardized multimodal and regional analgesic background, OFA reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared with a remifentanil-based technique, without a detectable difference in pain scores and with a similar safety profile.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06380244, registered 23 April 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04028-7
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-center randomized controlled trial

Wojciech Szpunar, Rafał Świstek, Anna Kwinta, Tomasz Drygalski et al.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-center randomized controlled trial

Wojciech Szpunar, Rafał Świstek, Anna Kwinta, Tomasz Drygalski, Jan Szpor, Tomasz Składzień, Michał Cicio, Katarzyna Maciejewska, Maciejewski Pawel, Tomasz Lonc, Aleksandra Żmuda, Teresa Kowal, Renata Bugielska
article en

Abstract

Multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia is standard in urological surgery, and there is additional interest in eliminating intraoperative opioids in prostate cancer surgery. Randomized evidence for opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is lacking. In this single-center randomized controlled trial, adult men undergoing RARP were allocated 1:1 to OFA (dexmedetomidine plus ketamine, no intraoperative opioids) or a remifentanil-based technique. Both groups received identical multimodal premedication, a bilateral quadratus lumborum block, sevoflurane maintenance and identical oxycodone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was cumulative PCA oxycodone consumption over the first 24 postoperative hours. Prespecified secondary outcomes were pain (NRS), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), the demanded-to-delivered PCA bolus ratio, and perioperative changes in serum creatinine and white-cell count. A total of 149 patients were analyzed (OFA n=75, opioid-based n=74). Cumulative 24-h oxycodone consumption was lower with OFA (median 12.0 mg [interquartile range, IQR 6.0-22.0] vs 19.0 mg [10.5-34.0]; p=0.001), with a Hodges-Lehmann location-shift estimate of -6.0 mg (95% confidence interval, CI -10.0 to -2.0). Pain scores did not differ at any time point, and PONV was infrequent, with no significant between-group difference. Intraoperative hemodynamic adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension), perioperative white-cell count and serum creatinine did not differ between groups. In RARP delivered on a standardized multimodal and regional analgesic background, OFA reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared with a remifentanil-based technique, without a detectable difference in pain scores and with a similar safety profile.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06380244, registered 23 April 2024.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.