Empirical insights on sources of knowledge in the Digital Markets Act ’s enforcement

Within three years of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) becoming applicable, the European Commission (Commission) has not only issued numerous designation decisions, but also two crucial non-compliance decisions, as well as adopted a number of other measures based on this regulation. This article analyses the references identified in the decisions adopted until July 2026, with a view to providing insight into what sources of knowledge the Commission uses when enforcing the DMA and what the functions of these references are. The results show that the catalogue of types of sources of knowledge invoked in the decisions is quite broad and includes, for example, reports and cases from other jurisdictions. However, the most frequently invoked source of knowledge is that from the industry. The analysis reveals that, although sources are diversified with regard to the conceptualization of market characteristics, knowledge from market participants is crucial for analysing a given infringement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Competition Journal
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2026.2744856
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical insights on sources of knowledge in the Digital Markets Act ’s enforcement

Joanna Mazur
European Competition Journal
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

Empirical insights on sources of knowledge in the Digital Markets Act ’s enforcement

Joanna Mazur
article en

Abstract

Within three years of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) becoming applicable, the European Commission (Commission) has not only issued numerous designation decisions, but also two crucial non-compliance decisions, as well as adopted a number of other measures based on this regulation. This article analyses the references identified in the decisions adopted until July 2026, with a view to providing insight into what sources of knowledge the Commission uses when enforcing the DMA and what the functions of these references are. The results show that the catalogue of types of sources of knowledge invoked in the decisions is quite broad and includes, for example, reports and cases from other jurisdictions. However, the most frequently invoked source of knowledge is that from the industry. The analysis reveals that, although sources are diversified with regard to the conceptualization of market characteristics, knowledge from market participants is crucial for analysing a given infringement.

European Competition Journal
University of Warsaw (PL)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.