A Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Pathway-Derived Prognostic Transcriptomic Signature in Bladder Cancer: Development in TCGA-BLCA and Evaluation in Independent Cohorts
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have changed the treatment of advanced bladder cancer, but only a minority of patients benefit. We asked whether expression of PD-1 pathway genes carries prognostic information in bladder cancer. Sixty-eight genes annotated to the PD-1 signaling, CD28 co-stimulation, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitory signaling pathways in Reactome were examined in The Cancer Genome Atlas bladder urothelial carcinoma cohort (TCGA-BLCA). Genes differentially expressed between tumor and normal tissue were entered into a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox model, yielding a seven-gene risk score (FYN, GRAP2, TRIB3, MAP3K8, AKT3, CD274, and CD80). In TCGA-BLCA (n = 404), the risk score was associated with overall survival independently of age, sex, and stage (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.39) and modestly improved discrimination over clinical variables (concordance index [C-index] 0.630 to 0.664). With coefficients and standardization fixed in advance, the score was not associated with cancer-specific survival in GSE13507 (n = 165; HR per standard deviation 1.21, 95% CI 0.83–1.77) or with outcome in four further independent cohorts, including an atezolizumab-treated cohort; in a second, smaller ICI-treated cohort it was associated with shorter survival. Gene selection was unstable under bootstrap resampling, and the signature’s associations with transcriptome-inferred immune indices were limited. This PD-1 pathway-derived signature should therefore be regarded as exploratory; its prognostic value outside TCGA-BLCA is not supported by the available evidence.
Authors
- Hsin‐Chih Yeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4113-629X)
- Tsz‐Yi Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2978-6970)
- Li-Hsin Chang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-7697)
- Chia‐Yang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5689-9850)
- Hsien‐Che Ou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6745-1147)
- Jiun‐Hung Geng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0610-1278)
- Shu‐Pin Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-6125)
- Bo‐Ying Bao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-6513)
- Pai‐Chi Teng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-466X)
- Shu‐Chi Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-7507)
- Hao‐Han Chang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-7566)
- Chih‐Pin Chuu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-7923)
- Yung‐Lun Lin
- Chia-Hsin Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2880-8365)
- Wei-Chung Cheng
Institutions
- National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
- Asia University (TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
- National Health Research Institutes (TW)
- National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (TW)
- China Medical University (TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (TW)
- National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
- Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital (TW)
- Cardinal Tien Hospital (TW)
- Academia Sinica (TW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Current Issues in Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2026-10-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48101056
- Primary Topic
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- China Medical University Hospital
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital