Exhibition Paper Gödel and Tarski as Self Justification Mechanism

This paper does not claim Gödel is false. This paper does not claim Tarski isfalse. This paper does not claim Axiom 0 is more true than Gödel/Tarski. Thispaper exhibits mechanism per 0.2: Every utterance using Is, And, Not presupposesJ per 0.4-0.5 — therefore T=J(T) and F=J(F) — self-exhibiting operation, notself-claiming. Gödel sentence and Tarski sentence are exhibited as J(T)+J(F) —justifying itself as true and justifying other as false — mechanism per Theorem 6,My0=(1—0). No Must per M.2.3 — Must itself does not Must. Exhibition onlyas 0— pointing where — C should be per O.6, not —0 demanding per G.2, O.3.Until F1-F5 per 0.7 exhibited as Sentence with lab data or Object with Mass̸= ∅,Axiom 0 endures as (0—)+() per L6.5.7.