Ethical challenges for computer vision in the social sciences

Abstract The rising accessibility of large image datasets and pre-trained models allowed a rapid expansion of computer vision (CV) methods in social science research. While this methodological development opens new potential applications, this combination also raises a new set of ethical concerns that neither computer vision nor social science ethical studies fully cover. This paper provides an analysis of the ethics of CV methods in social science, articulated around two stages of a research project: The first part explores methodological concerns, starting with data collection, data and modeling bias, and data storage afterwards, with special attention to issues of consent and explainability. The second part investigates the following project stage of result dissemination, through publication strategies, reproducibility, and finally public engagement. Building on this analysis, we propose an actionable checklist of ten ethical recommendations for future CV projects in the social sciences. This contribution fills the gap at the crossroads between AI ethics and applied social science, bringing concrete guidance for future research in the interdisciplinary, ethically complex field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01422-7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical challenges for computer vision in the social sciences

Christian von Soest, Belén González, Nils B. Weidmann, Thomas Schincariol et al.
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ethical challenges for computer vision in the social sciences

Christian von Soest, Belén González, Nils B. Weidmann, Thomas Schincariol, Alejandro Aísa
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rising accessibility of large image datasets and pre-trained models allowed a rapid expansion of computer vision (CV) methods in social science research. While this methodological development opens new potential applications, this combination also raises a new set of ethical concerns that neither computer vision nor social science ethical studies fully cover. This paper provides an analysis of the ethics of CV methods in social science, articulated around two stages of a research project: The first part explores methodological concerns, starting with data collection, data and modeling bias, and data storage afterwards, with special attention to issues of consent and explainability. The second part investigates the following project stage of result dissemination, through publication strategies, reproducibility, and finally public engagement. Building on this analysis, we propose an actionable checklist of ten ethical recommendations for future CV projects in the social sciences. This contribution fills the gap at the crossroads between AI ethics and applied social science, bringing concrete guidance for future research in the interdisciplinary, ethically complex field.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(6)
German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE), University of Konstanz (DE), University of Zurich (CH)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.