Protocol for the Therapy Personalisation Using Multiomic Analyses in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (THAMES‐IBD) Study

ABSTRACT Background Despite an expanding repertoire of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), treatment outcomes remain suboptimal, with only 30%–40% of patients achieving sustained remission. Emerging evidence indicates that therapeutic outcomes are shaped by complex interactions between host immune pathways, the gut microbiome and psychosocial factors. However, robust biomarkers to predict individual treatment response are currently lacking. Aims The Therapy Personalisation using Multiomic Analyses in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (THAMES‐IBD) study aims to address this critical unmet need by identifying predictors that differentiate responders from non‐responders to advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) using an integrated multiomics approach. Methods The THAMES‐IBD study is a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study recruiting adults with active UC initiating or switching advanced therapies, alongside patients with inactive UC and non‐IBD controls. Multimodal samples will be collected from recruited participants prior to treatment initiation, including stool (metagenomics and metabolomics), blood (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) and mucosal biopsies (transcriptomics). Longitudinal blood and stool samples, as well as clinical, demographic, dietary and comprehensive psychosocial data, will be collected at baseline and at 8–14 weeks and 28–32 weeks after commencing a new advanced therapy. Treatment outcomes will be pragmatically defined based on validated patient‐reported outcome (PRO‐2) scores and biochemical measures. Multiomics integration will be performed using complementary unsupervised and supervised approaches. Predictive models will undergo internal cross‐validation and, where feasible, external validation in independent cohorts. Conclusion Through deep multimodal phenotyping of patients with UC, the THAMES‐IBD study seeks to identify biological mechanisms associated with therapeutic response and resistance. These insights have the potential to inform the development of novel predictive biomarkers to guide precision medicine strategies, minimise ineffective treatment cycling and ultimately improve outcomes for patients with IBD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCC Plus
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc5.70090
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protocol for the Therapy Personalisation Using Multiomic Analyses in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (THAMES‐IBD) Study

Sadek Malas, Yang Song, James Leslie Alexander, Meztli L. Matadamas-Guzman et al.
JCC Plus
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Protocol for the Therapy Personalisation Using Multiomic Analyses in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (THAMES‐IBD) Study

Sadek Malas, Yang Song, James Leslie Alexander, Meztli L. Matadamas-Guzman, Erik L. Allman, Heaseung Sophia Chung, Bat‐Erdene Jugder, Cristina Di Poto, Aamir Saifuddin, Dimple Dixit, John P. Thomas, Kyle Bednar, Isabel Laszczak, Nick Powell, Ailsa Hart
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Despite an expanding repertoire of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), treatment outcomes remain suboptimal, with only 30%–40% of patients achieving sustained remission. Emerging evidence indicates that therapeutic outcomes are shaped by complex interactions between host immune pathways, the gut microbiome and psychosocial factors. However, robust biomarkers to predict individual treatment response are currently lacking. Aims The Therapy Personalisation using Multiomic Analyses in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (THAMES‐IBD) study aims to address this critical unmet need by identifying predictors that differentiate responders from non‐responders to advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) using an integrated multiomics approach. Methods The THAMES‐IBD study is a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study recruiting adults with active UC initiating or switching advanced therapies, alongside patients with inactive UC and non‐IBD controls. Multimodal samples will be collected from recruited participants prior to treatment initiation, including stool (metagenomics and metabolomics), blood (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) and mucosal biopsies (transcriptomics). Longitudinal blood and stool samples, as well as clinical, demographic, dietary and comprehensive psychosocial data, will be collected at baseline and at 8–14 weeks and 28–32 weeks after commencing a new advanced therapy. Treatment outcomes will be pragmatically defined based on validated patient‐reported outcome (PRO‐2) scores and biochemical measures. Multiomics integration will be performed using complementary unsupervised and supervised approaches. Predictive models will undergo internal cross‐validation and, where feasible, external validation in independent cohorts. Conclusion Through deep multimodal phenotyping of patients with UC, the THAMES‐IBD study seeks to identify biological mechanisms associated with therapeutic response and resistance. These insights have the potential to inform the development of novel predictive biomarkers to guide precision medicine strategies, minimise ineffective treatment cycling and ultimately improve outcomes for patients with IBD.

JCC PlusVol. 1(6)
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Hammersmith Hospital (GB), AstraZeneca (Switzerland) (CH), AstraZeneca (Japan) (JP), AstraZeneca (Finland) (FI), Tunbridge Wells Hospital (GB), St Mark's Hospital (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.