Mapping the Silence: Cross-Lingual Asymmetries in Large Language Model Refusal and Evasion on Sensitive History

As large language models increasingly shape public discourse, this study evaluates how US and China-based models govern access to politically sensitive history in US English and Mandarin Chinese. Across 2,400 interactions covering sixty globally significant events, we examined how prompt configurations modulate LLM responses. Chinese models demonstrated statistically significant cross-lingual disparities, restricting Mandarin queries up to three times more than English queries. Furthermore, models were substantially more likely to restrict responses to subjective, political, or contemporary framings than factual queries, highlighting the need for further evaluation of cross-lingual differences in AI systems and their security implications in politically sensitive contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of East Asia Security
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.172485
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Silence: Cross-Lingual Asymmetries in Large Language Model Refusal and Evasion on Sensitive History

Scott Mann, Judith Bishop, Dr. Usman Malik, Suraj Poudel et al.
Journal of East Asia Security
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Mapping the Silence: Cross-Lingual Asymmetries in Large Language Model Refusal and Evasion on Sensitive History

Scott Mann, Judith Bishop, Dr. Usman Malik, Suraj Poudel, Andre Clark Go, Firoz Noorbasha, Jordan Baillie, Chunmei Pan, Nisha Dileep
article en

Abstract

As large language models increasingly shape public discourse, this study evaluates how US and China-based models govern access to politically sensitive history in US English and Mandarin Chinese. Across 2,400 interactions covering sixty globally significant events, we examined how prompt configurations modulate LLM responses. Chinese models demonstrated statistically significant cross-lingual disparities, restricting Mandarin queries up to three times more than English queries. Furthermore, models were substantially more likely to restrict responses to subjective, political, or contemporary framings than factual queries, highlighting the need for further evaluation of cross-lingual differences in AI systems and their security implications in politically sensitive contexts.

Journal of East Asia SecurityVol. 2(1)
La Trobe University (AU)
La Trobe University, Division of Mathematical Sciences
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.