Generalised Bit-Vector Abstractions for Formal Verification of Quantum Error-Detection and Entanglement Circuits over $$\{H,X,{\text{C-NOT}}\}$$: CSS Constructions, Soundness, and Mutation-Based Validation

Abstract Formal verification of quantum circuits becomes increasingly difficult as circuit size increases, since exhaustive reasoning over the underlying Hilbert space is computationally expensive. In previous work [1], we introduced a bit-vector abstraction that separates the tracking of superposition from basis-state behaviour, enabling SMT-based verification of fixed-size error-detection and entanglement circuits constructed from H , X , and C-NOT gates. This paper extends that framework in five directions. First, we generalise the correctness properties to parametrised repetition and concatenated phase-flip codes with up to 101 logical elements. Second, we verify syndrome extraction for CSS codes specified by arbitrary parity-check matrices, including the Steane code, the [[15, 7, 3]] quantum Hamming code, the [[15, 1, 3]] quantum Reed–Muller code, and rotated surface codes with distances up to 101. The verification considers arbitrary error patterns, error detection up to a specified weight, and recovery using a classical decoder. Counterexamples are obtained for errors beyond the correction or detection capability of the respective codes. Third, we characterise the fragment of $$\{H,X,\text {C-NOT}\}$$ circuits for which the abstraction faithfully represents the corresponding Hilbert-space semantics. We prove soundness for this fragment, demonstrate the necessity of the stated conditions through counterexamples, validate the characterisation by differential testing against state-vector simulation, and prove the six lemmas established in the original work. Fourth, we conduct a mutation study using 13 mutation operators and automatically identify equivalent mutants. Within the evaluated fault model, the approach detects all 622 non-equivalent mutants. Fifth, we implement the approach directly using the Z3 API and verify GHZ circuits with up to 262,144 qubits across three topologies on a 16 GB laptop. The evaluation includes repeated measurements and a controlled ablation of the encoding pipeline and solver version. Experiments with random H +C-NOT networks show that verification cost increases steeply with circuit depth when outputs depend on a large number of inputs. The approach is not intended to cover general stabiliser circuits, Y -type stabilisers, fault-tolerant protocols, or physical noise. We identify the extensions required to address these cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SN Computer Science
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-026-05395-6
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalised Bit-Vector Abstractions for Formal Verification of Quantum Error-Detection and Entanglement Circuits over $$\{H,X,{\text{C-NOT}}\}$$: CSS Constructions, Soundness, and Mutation-Based Validation

Arun Govindankutty
SN Computer Science
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Generalised Bit-Vector Abstractions for Formal Verification of Quantum Error-Detection and Entanglement Circuits over $$\{H,X,{\text{C-NOT}}\}$$: CSS Constructions, Soundness, and Mutation-Based Validation

Arun Govindankutty
article en

Abstract

Abstract Formal verification of quantum circuits becomes increasingly difficult as circuit size increases, since exhaustive reasoning over the underlying Hilbert space is computationally expensive. In previous work [1], we introduced a bit-vector abstraction that separates the tracking of superposition from basis-state behaviour, enabling SMT-based verification of fixed-size error-detection and entanglement circuits constructed from H , X , and C-NOT gates. This paper extends that framework in five directions. First, we generalise the correctness properties to parametrised repetition and concatenated phase-flip codes with up to 101 logical elements. Second, we verify syndrome extraction for CSS codes specified by arbitrary parity-check matrices, including the Steane code, the [[15, 7, 3]] quantum Hamming code, the [[15, 1, 3]] quantum Reed–Muller code, and rotated surface codes with distances up to 101. The verification considers arbitrary error patterns, error detection up to a specified weight, and recovery using a classical decoder. Counterexamples are obtained for errors beyond the correction or detection capability of the respective codes. Third, we characterise the fragment of $$\{H,X,\text {C-NOT}\}$$ circuits for which the abstraction faithfully represents the corresponding Hilbert-space semantics. We prove soundness for this fragment, demonstrate the necessity of the stated conditions through counterexamples, validate the characterisation by differential testing against state-vector simulation, and prove the six lemmas established in the original work. Fourth, we conduct a mutation study using 13 mutation operators and automatically identify equivalent mutants. Within the evaluated fault model, the approach detects all 622 non-equivalent mutants. Fifth, we implement the approach directly using the Z3 API and verify GHZ circuits with up to 262,144 qubits across three topologies on a 16 GB laptop. The evaluation includes repeated measurements and a controlled ablation of the encoding pipeline and solver version. Experiments with random H +C-NOT networks show that verification cost increases steeply with circuit depth when outputs depend on a large number of inputs. The approach is not intended to cover general stabiliser circuits, Y -type stabilisers, fault-tolerant protocols, or physical noise. We identify the extensions required to address these cases.

SN Computer ScienceVol. 7(7)
North Dakota State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.