3D Broadband Ground-Motion Simulations of Cascadia Megathrust Earthquakes: Full-Margin Scenarios Incorporating Variable Magnitudes and Frontal Thrust Splay Faulting

ABSTRACT Great megathrust earthquakes (∼Mw 8–9) that rupture along the Cascadia Subduction Zone pose significant shaking and tsunami hazards to the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Although these large earthquakes are documented in the geologic record, none have been recorded with modern instrumentation, complicating regional seismic hazard assessments. To improve constraints on seismic hazard estimates for future earthquakes, we develop 3D broadband (0–10 Hz) ground-motion simulations for 36 full-margin megathrust earthquake scenarios through the Cascadia Coastlines and Peoples Hazards Research Hub. These simulations expand on the M9 Project (Frankel et al., 2018; Wirth, Frankel, et al., 2018) by incorporating a broader range of rupture parameters—variable magnitudes, splay faulting, and geodetically informed slip distributions. Benchmarking these simulations against the Next Generation Attenuation Subduction (NGA-Sub) ground-motion models shows reasonable fits for non-basin sites, although simulations predict stronger shaking at short (0–2 s) and long (6–10 s) periods. NGA-Sub basin terms improve fits to synthetic shaking within the Seattle Basin but underpredict amplitudes by a factor of 2 at periods of 2–5 s. We also evaluate how rupture characteristics influence regional inland shaking variability and basin response in the Puget Lowlands. Larger magnitude scenarios generally cause stronger inland shaking due to farther inland extents of slip and larger strong-motion-generating fault patches but show little difference in basin amplification within the Puget Lowlands compared to smaller magnitude events. Along-dip hypocenter location strongly influences overall inland shaking, with offshore (updip) hypocenters generating on average ∼45% higher shaking at long periods (>6 s) compared to onshore (downdip) hypocenters due to rupture directivity effects. Offshore splay faults minimally affect inland shaking but alter offshore deformation important for coupled ground-shaking and tsunami scenarios. Finally, we show that rupture directivity increases amplification within the Seattle Basin through the generation and interaction of higher order mode surface waves, an effect of 3D basin geometry that cannot be captured using 1D approximations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120260148
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D Broadband Ground-Motion Simulations of Cascadia Megathrust Earthquakes: Full-Margin Scenarios Incorporating Variable Magnitudes and Frontal Thrust Splay Faulting

Audrey M. Dunham, Madeleine C. Lucas, Harold Tobin, Erin A. Wirth et al.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

3D Broadband Ground-Motion Simulations of Cascadia Megathrust Earthquakes: Full-Margin Scenarios Incorporating Variable Magnitudes and Frontal Thrust Splay Faulting

Audrey M. Dunham, Madeleine C. Lucas, Harold Tobin, Erin A. Wirth, James Biemiller, Anna M. Ledeczi, Alex R. R. Grant, David A. Schmidt, Jeonghyeop Kim, Janet Tilden Watt, Arthur D. Frankel
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Great megathrust earthquakes (∼Mw 8–9) that rupture along the Cascadia Subduction Zone pose significant shaking and tsunami hazards to the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Although these large earthquakes are documented in the geologic record, none have been recorded with modern instrumentation, complicating regional seismic hazard assessments. To improve constraints on seismic hazard estimates for future earthquakes, we develop 3D broadband (0–10 Hz) ground-motion simulations for 36 full-margin megathrust earthquake scenarios through the Cascadia Coastlines and Peoples Hazards Research Hub. These simulations expand on the M9 Project (Frankel et al., 2018; Wirth, Frankel, et al., 2018) by incorporating a broader range of rupture parameters—variable magnitudes, splay faulting, and geodetically informed slip distributions. Benchmarking these simulations against the Next Generation Attenuation Subduction (NGA-Sub) ground-motion models shows reasonable fits for non-basin sites, although simulations predict stronger shaking at short (0–2 s) and long (6–10 s) periods. NGA-Sub basin terms improve fits to synthetic shaking within the Seattle Basin but underpredict amplitudes by a factor of 2 at periods of 2–5 s. We also evaluate how rupture characteristics influence regional inland shaking variability and basin response in the Puget Lowlands. Larger magnitude scenarios generally cause stronger inland shaking due to farther inland extents of slip and larger strong-motion-generating fault patches but show little difference in basin amplification within the Puget Lowlands compared to smaller magnitude events. Along-dip hypocenter location strongly influences overall inland shaking, with offshore (updip) hypocenters generating on average ∼45% higher shaking at long periods (>6 s) compared to onshore (downdip) hypocenters due to rupture directivity effects. Offshore splay faults minimally affect inland shaking but alter offshore deformation important for coupled ground-shaking and tsunami scenarios. Finally, we show that rupture directivity increases amplification within the Seattle Basin through the generation and interaction of higher order mode surface waves, an effect of 3D basin geometry that cannot be captured using 1D approximations.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
United States Geological Survey (US), Kangwon National University (KR), Pacific Science Center (US), Earth and Space Research (US), Earthquake Science Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.