A democratic deficit in climate education? Youth experiences and public expectations in Australia

Education systems must equip students to navigate futures in a climate-changed world. Yet, climate education remains fragmented and overly focused on scientific knowledge transfer. This can leave young people anxious and excluded from meaningful learning. This paper explores the (mis)alignment between young people’s lived experiences of climate learning and the expectations of the wider public in Australia. We combine survey data from 1,058 adults with qualitative data from 74 young people (aged 11–16). Findings suggest that while both groups value climate education, adults prioritize STEM disciplines, while young people express deep frustration with the system’s narrow scope and demand greater opportunities for civic action, critical discussion, and emotional literacy. The paper argues that reconciling the expectations of society with the lived experiences of young people is essential to renewing the democratic legitimacy and future relevance of education in an era of accelerating environmental and social change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Environmental Education
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2026.2733557
Primary Topic
Environmental and sustainability education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A democratic deficit in climate education? Youth experiences and public expectations in Australia

Gabi Mocatta, Kim M. Beasy, Charlotte Earl-Jones, Chloe Lucas
The Journal of Environmental Education
Environmental and sustainability education
article

A democratic deficit in climate education? Youth experiences and public expectations in Australia

Gabi Mocatta, Kim M. Beasy, Charlotte Earl-Jones, Chloe Lucas
article en

Abstract

Education systems must equip students to navigate futures in a climate-changed world. Yet, climate education remains fragmented and overly focused on scientific knowledge transfer. This can leave young people anxious and excluded from meaningful learning. This paper explores the (mis)alignment between young people’s lived experiences of climate learning and the expectations of the wider public in Australia. We combine survey data from 1,058 adults with qualitative data from 74 young people (aged 11–16). Findings suggest that while both groups value climate education, adults prioritize STEM disciplines, while young people express deep frustration with the system’s narrow scope and demand greater opportunities for civic action, critical discussion, and emotional literacy. The paper argues that reconciling the expectations of society with the lived experiences of young people is essential to renewing the democratic legitimacy and future relevance of education in an era of accelerating environmental and social change.

The Journal of Environmental Education
University of Tasmania (AU), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU)
Spencer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental and sustainability education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.