Modern Approach to Reflux Testing: When, Which, and How?

Modern reflux monitoring technology provides for both prolonged wireless and 24-hour catheter-based testing options. Wireless pH monitoring offers the advantages of patient comfort and prolonged assessment for up to 96 hours to account for day-to-day variation of GERD, but only distal acid reflux is measured. pH-impedance monitoring detects all reflux episodes regardless of acidity, characterizes refluxate content, identifies proximal extent, and measures baseline mucosal impedance which reflects mucosal integrity as well as longitudinal reflux-related injury, but the indwelling catheter causes patient discomfort and limits monitoring to 24 hours. Metrics from reflux monitoring and findings from endoscopy, together with adjunctive tests such as high-resolution manometry, can provide conclusive and/or supportive evidence for or against pathologic reflux, utilizing the Lyon Consensus 2.0 framework. Selection of optimal testing strategy should depend on presenting symptom phenotypes, clinical indications and scenarios, local testing options, and patient tolerance. Testing should be performed off acid suppressive therapy for patients with unproven GERD, while those with proven GERD and persistent symptoms despite optimized anti-reflux therapy should undergo pH-impedance monitoring on acid suppression. If endoscopy is indicated, wireless monitoring can be performed at the same setting, especially for typical perceptive (heartburn, chest pain) symptoms. pH-impedance monitoring is preferred for primary regurgitation and belching, while both modalities are options for atypical symptoms. Reflux monitoring may be indicated for assessing symptoms after foregut interventions, although no consensus on post-operative thresholds or optimal testing methodology has been established. Reflux monitoring is a valuable tool for evaluating and directing management of esophageal symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004232
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern Approach to Reflux Testing: When, Which, and How?

Walter W. Chan, Matthew K. Schroeder, Chandra Prakash Gyawali, Muhammad Hashim Hayat
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Modern Approach to Reflux Testing: When, Which, and How?

Walter W. Chan, Matthew K. Schroeder, Chandra Prakash Gyawali, Muhammad Hashim Hayat
article en

Abstract

Modern reflux monitoring technology provides for both prolonged wireless and 24-hour catheter-based testing options. Wireless pH monitoring offers the advantages of patient comfort and prolonged assessment for up to 96 hours to account for day-to-day variation of GERD, but only distal acid reflux is measured. pH-impedance monitoring detects all reflux episodes regardless of acidity, characterizes refluxate content, identifies proximal extent, and measures baseline mucosal impedance which reflects mucosal integrity as well as longitudinal reflux-related injury, but the indwelling catheter causes patient discomfort and limits monitoring to 24 hours. Metrics from reflux monitoring and findings from endoscopy, together with adjunctive tests such as high-resolution manometry, can provide conclusive and/or supportive evidence for or against pathologic reflux, utilizing the Lyon Consensus 2.0 framework. Selection of optimal testing strategy should depend on presenting symptom phenotypes, clinical indications and scenarios, local testing options, and patient tolerance. Testing should be performed off acid suppressive therapy for patients with unproven GERD, while those with proven GERD and persistent symptoms despite optimized anti-reflux therapy should undergo pH-impedance monitoring on acid suppression. If endoscopy is indicated, wireless monitoring can be performed at the same setting, especially for typical perceptive (heartburn, chest pain) symptoms. pH-impedance monitoring is preferred for primary regurgitation and belching, while both modalities are options for atypical symptoms. Reflux monitoring may be indicated for assessing symptoms after foregut interventions, although no consensus on post-operative thresholds or optimal testing methodology has been established. Reflux monitoring is a valuable tool for evaluating and directing management of esophageal symptoms.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.