Influence of bone-specific material properties on finite element modelling of the skull

Abstract The material properties of bone in the skull are known to be heterogeneous and orthotropic, although datasets detailing these properties on a species level are limited. Therefore, computational modelling frequently uses homogeneous, isotropic material properties to analyse stresses/strains in the skull. However, it is often unknown how the choice of bone/s from which the elastic modulus is measured, or the direction in which it is measured, influences predicted stresses/strains. This study integrated imaging and measured muscle properties to create a subject-specific finite element model of a rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) skull, to investigate the influence of modelling the elastic modulus of bone through varying levels of complexity. The results demonstrate the importance of modelling orthotropic material properties, if known. Strain distribution was insensitive to whether the same isotropic elastic modulus was used for all bones in the skull versus modelling bone-specific isotropic elastic modulus. Strain distribution was also similar when using an isotropic elastic modulus based on measurement in different orthotropic directions, albeit with a slight difference when measured in the medio-lateral direction. This highlights that isotropic, homogeneous modelling of the skull is appropriate when analysing strain distribution, although alternative material modelling should be considered when strain magnitude is of particular interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.252468
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of bone-specific material properties on finite element modelling of the skull

Michael J. Fagan, Graham N. Askew, Peter J. Watson, Roger W. P. Kissane et al.
Royal Society Open Science
Elasticity and Material Modeling
article

Influence of bone-specific material properties on finite element modelling of the skull

Michael J. Fagan, Graham N. Askew, Peter J. Watson, Roger W. P. Kissane, Karl Bates, Linjie Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The material properties of bone in the skull are known to be heterogeneous and orthotropic, although datasets detailing these properties on a species level are limited. Therefore, computational modelling frequently uses homogeneous, isotropic material properties to analyse stresses/strains in the skull. However, it is often unknown how the choice of bone/s from which the elastic modulus is measured, or the direction in which it is measured, influences predicted stresses/strains. This study integrated imaging and measured muscle properties to create a subject-specific finite element model of a rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) skull, to investigate the influence of modelling the elastic modulus of bone through varying levels of complexity. The results demonstrate the importance of modelling orthotropic material properties, if known. Strain distribution was insensitive to whether the same isotropic elastic modulus was used for all bones in the skull versus modelling bone-specific isotropic elastic modulus. Strain distribution was also similar when using an isotropic elastic modulus based on measurement in different orthotropic directions, albeit with a slight difference when measured in the medio-lateral direction. This highlights that isotropic, homogeneous modelling of the skull is appropriate when analysing strain distribution, although alternative material modelling should be considered when strain magnitude is of particular interest.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(10)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Hull (GB)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.