Overview of Regulatory Guidelines Related to Methods and Models for Small Populations

This paper provides an overview of approaches and related guidelines from the EMA, FDA, and ICH that are relevant for obtaining clinical evidence for small populations to support regulatory decision making. The approaches are grouped into three categories: (1) maximizing the attainable sample size, (2) adapting the trial design to deal with a small sample size, and (3) including external information, while also examining the role of modeling. Guidelines for clinical trials, guidelines specifically for small populations, as well as guidelines that include the use of modeling to support clinical evidence were included in the review. A recurring theme throughout the guidelines is the critical importance of the clinical context, affecting both the evidentiary standard and which approaches and models are acceptable. Two key gaps were identified: (1) guidance on Bayesian approaches is limited, and (2) there is no clear guidance on how to synthesize evidence across different modalities, such as trial results and Real-World Data, from both a practical and regulatory perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70523
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overview of Regulatory Guidelines Related to Methods and Models for Small Populations

Letao Li, Kit C. B. Roes, Kristin E. Karlsson, Laurens Sluijterman et al.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Overview of Regulatory Guidelines Related to Methods and Models for Small Populations

Letao Li, Kit C. B. Roes, Kristin E. Karlsson, Laurens Sluijterman, Sarah Zohar, Joanna IntHout, Vincent Damotte
article en

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of approaches and related guidelines from the EMA, FDA, and ICH that are relevant for obtaining clinical evidence for small populations to support regulatory decision making. The approaches are grouped into three categories: (1) maximizing the attainable sample size, (2) adapting the trial design to deal with a small sample size, and (3) including external information, while also examining the role of modeling. Guidelines for clinical trials, guidelines specifically for small populations, as well as guidelines that include the use of modeling to support clinical evidence were included in the review. A recurring theme throughout the guidelines is the critical importance of the clinical context, affecting both the evidentiary standard and which approaches and models are acceptable. Two key gaps were identified: (1) guidance on Bayesian approaches is limited, and (2) there is no clear guidance on how to synthesize evidence across different modalities, such as trial results and Real-World Data, from both a practical and regulatory perspective.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Medical Products Agency (SE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
UK Research and Innovation, European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Innovate UK, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation, European Health and Digital Executive Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.