Settler Toxicity: Contaminated Restitutions and the Contagion of Hope

ABSTRACT This article introduces settler toxicity: the symbolic charge that lodges itself in Indigenous cultural‐material worlds through their passage through settler institutions, producing real harm through institutional and epistemic vectors rather than particle matter. Drawing on participatory workshops with Palestinians engaging with objects from one depopulated village, it documents three components through which settler toxicity operates—polluted provenance, contamination by association and toxic epistemologies—and examines what communities do when restitution frameworks prove inadequate. Settler toxicity persists even under conditions designed to resist it: good intentions do not detoxify. Yet toxicity does not foreclose action. We document how belongings turn into instruments of solidarity and sovereign assertion. Restitution is not a dispute over possession but a struggle over Indigenous sovereignty, self‐determination and the right of return. Just restitutions require contaminated alliances: relations of co‐resistance that acknowledge settler scholars cannot stand outside the toxic structures they seek to contest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70209
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Settler Toxicity: Contaminated Restitutions and the Contagion of Hope

Noam Leshem
Antipode
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Settler Toxicity: Contaminated Restitutions and the Contagion of Hope

Noam Leshem
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article introduces settler toxicity: the symbolic charge that lodges itself in Indigenous cultural‐material worlds through their passage through settler institutions, producing real harm through institutional and epistemic vectors rather than particle matter. Drawing on participatory workshops with Palestinians engaging with objects from one depopulated village, it documents three components through which settler toxicity operates—polluted provenance, contamination by association and toxic epistemologies—and examines what communities do when restitution frameworks prove inadequate. Settler toxicity persists even under conditions designed to resist it: good intentions do not detoxify. Yet toxicity does not foreclose action. We document how belongings turn into instruments of solidarity and sovereign assertion. Restitution is not a dispute over possession but a struggle over Indigenous sovereignty, self‐determination and the right of return. Just restitutions require contaminated alliances: relations of co‐resistance that acknowledge settler scholars cannot stand outside the toxic structures they seek to contest.

AntipodeVol. 58(6)
Durham University (GB)
German Historical Institute, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.