Digital collectives in precarious work: comparing gig workers’ common voices across online communities

As gig workers receive inadequate support from digital labor platforms and (inter)national institutions, many face systemic challenges—such as income insecurity, algorithmic management, and social isolation—and turn to online communities instead. Identification with such shared spaces is fundamental to fostering relational connections and collective practices that help workers cope and succeed. However, these spaces remain poorly understood. This study examines how social media affordances and gig work type shape what social identity scholars call a “common voice” (i.e., the collective expression of identification in an online community). Using computational sentiment analysis and quantitative content analysis of 8,319 posts and 153,440 comments from six of the largest Reddit communities for gig workers, the study finds that common voices emerge, despite the atomizing characteristics of gig work (e.g., geographic dispersion and platform mediation) and the constraint of social cues on the platform that hosts the community. Moreover, common voices significantly differ between platform-specific communities and generic communities for gig workers in themes, sentiments, message length and image use. These findings extend scholarship on gig work, identification, and social media affordances by highlighting their intersection—showing how gig worker communities can act as digital collectives that foster identification and work relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Communication
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2026.2729653
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital collectives in precarious work: comparing gig workers’ common voices across online communities

Phuong Hoan Le, Yijing Wang
Review of Communication
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Digital collectives in precarious work: comparing gig workers’ common voices across online communities

Phuong Hoan Le, Yijing Wang
article en

Abstract

As gig workers receive inadequate support from digital labor platforms and (inter)national institutions, many face systemic challenges—such as income insecurity, algorithmic management, and social isolation—and turn to online communities instead. Identification with such shared spaces is fundamental to fostering relational connections and collective practices that help workers cope and succeed. However, these spaces remain poorly understood. This study examines how social media affordances and gig work type shape what social identity scholars call a “common voice” (i.e., the collective expression of identification in an online community). Using computational sentiment analysis and quantitative content analysis of 8,319 posts and 153,440 comments from six of the largest Reddit communities for gig workers, the study finds that common voices emerge, despite the atomizing characteristics of gig work (e.g., geographic dispersion and platform mediation) and the constraint of social cues on the platform that hosts the community. Moreover, common voices significantly differ between platform-specific communities and generic communities for gig workers in themes, sentiments, message length and image use. These findings extend scholarship on gig work, identification, and social media affordances by highlighting their intersection—showing how gig worker communities can act as digital collectives that foster identification and work relationships.

Review of Communication
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.