Segmentation of high-cost patients in England: insights from a machine learning analysis

Abstract Background Segmentation of high-cost patients can be used to inform service design. We aimed to cluster high-cost patients in the English healthcare system into distinct groups based on diagnoses and socioeconomic characteristics. Methods We examined primary and secondary care costs in the financial year 2018/19 for 10,119,490 adult patients registered with general practices in England contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, representing around 23% of the adult population in England. High-cost patients were defined as those in the top 1% of total care costs. We used multiple unsupervised machine learning approaches to group patients based on diagnoses, age, sex, deprivation, and ethnicity, and evaluated the resulting clusters for validity and stability using established indices. We also examined several patient subgroups, including age-stratified groups, in-year decedents and patients with the highest unplanned care costs. Results High-cost patients accounted for 26.8% of total healthcare costs in the study population. They had average annual costs of £17,485 (median: £14,609; interquartile range: £12,028£19,633, 2018 prices) compared with £653 (median: £103, interquartile range: £14–£352) for the population. The optimal clustering method was hierarchical clustering, which produced nine clusters with distinct multimorbidity and sociodemographic profiles. Across those clusters, mean age varied between 56 and 79 years and mean annual costs per cluster ranged between £15,792 (95% CI: £15,629–£15,955) and £19,107 (95%CI: £18,784–£19,430). Several core clinical profiles recurred across different clustering approaches and subgroup analyses, including younger people with liver disease and mental health conditions, patients with nodal metastases, patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases, and older people with cardiovascular disease and dementia. Conclusions High-cost patients are a heterogeneous population with distinct clinical and sociodemographic profiles and utilisation patterns. Incorporating cluster-based approaches into population health management may help inform the targeting of case management programmes, resource allocation, and health system planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05233-9
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Segmentation of high-cost patients in England: insights from a machine learning analysis

Laura Anselmi, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Shaolin Wang, Matt Sutton et al.
BMC Medicine
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Segmentation of high-cost patients in England: insights from a machine learning analysis

Laura Anselmi, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Shaolin Wang, Matt Sutton, Michael Anderson, Thomas Beaney
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Segmentation of high-cost patients can be used to inform service design. We aimed to cluster high-cost patients in the English healthcare system into distinct groups based on diagnoses and socioeconomic characteristics. Methods We examined primary and secondary care costs in the financial year 2018/19 for 10,119,490 adult patients registered with general practices in England contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, representing around 23% of the adult population in England. High-cost patients were defined as those in the top 1% of total care costs. We used multiple unsupervised machine learning approaches to group patients based on diagnoses, age, sex, deprivation, and ethnicity, and evaluated the resulting clusters for validity and stability using established indices. We also examined several patient subgroups, including age-stratified groups, in-year decedents and patients with the highest unplanned care costs. Results High-cost patients accounted for 26.8% of total healthcare costs in the study population. They had average annual costs of £17,485 (median: £14,609; interquartile range: £12,028£19,633, 2018 prices) compared with £653 (median: £103, interquartile range: £14–£352) for the population. The optimal clustering method was hierarchical clustering, which produced nine clusters with distinct multimorbidity and sociodemographic profiles. Across those clusters, mean age varied between 56 and 79 years and mean annual costs per cluster ranged between £15,792 (95% CI: £15,629–£15,955) and £19,107 (95%CI: £18,784–£19,430). Several core clinical profiles recurred across different clustering approaches and subgroup analyses, including younger people with liver disease and mental health conditions, patients with nodal metastases, patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases, and older people with cardiovascular disease and dementia. Conclusions High-cost patients are a heterogeneous population with distinct clinical and sociodemographic profiles and utilisation patterns. Incorporating cluster-based approaches into population health management may help inform the targeting of case management programmes, resource allocation, and health system planning.

BMC Medicine
National University of Singapore (SG), University of Manchester (GB), National University Health System (SG), Imperial College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.