Frequency of plastic occurrence varies across phylogeny but not ecology in seabirds

Seabirds are especially vulnerable to ingesting plastic pollution. However, we have a limited understanding of which traits might increase their risk of plastic ingestion. Here, we use a dataset of seabird plastic occurrence records (93 281 birds from 240 species) to investigate which species accumulate plastic and whether this is related to diet, foraging method, pelagic specialism, body mass or phylogenetic position. In our dataset, 182 of the 240 species (76%) contained plastic. Within orders, the highest levels were in pelicans (Pelecaniformes; 67%) and the lowest in penguins (Sphenisciformes; 5%). In our phylogenetically informed analysis, accounting for artefacts of study design (e.g. sample size, year, ocean, source, age class and sampling method), none of the ecological traits we tested had a consistent effect on plastic occurrence. Instead, phylogenetic relatedness was the best predictor in our models, reflecting the tight correlation between seabird phylogenetic groupings and their traits. This suggests that phylogenetic position may serve as a rapid way to identify species likely to accumulate plastic. Future research should focus on developing predictions of plastic accumulation risk for understudied species, implementing standardized methodologies and investigating species-specific morphological and environmental variables that may affect their risk of plastic accumulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Letters
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2026.0079
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency of plastic occurrence varies across phylogeny but not ecology in seabirds

Stephanie B. Borrelle, Steven J. Portugal, Jennifer L. Lavers, Stephanie Avery‐Gomm et al.
Biology Letters
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Frequency of plastic occurrence varies across phylogeny but not ecology in seabirds

Stephanie B. Borrelle, Steven J. Portugal, Jennifer L. Lavers, Stephanie Avery‐Gomm, Natalie Cooper, Alexander L. Bond, Nia Potapova, Chrissie Potter, Hugh Possingham, Jennifer Provencher
article en

Abstract

Seabirds are especially vulnerable to ingesting plastic pollution. However, we have a limited understanding of which traits might increase their risk of plastic ingestion. Here, we use a dataset of seabird plastic occurrence records (93 281 birds from 240 species) to investigate which species accumulate plastic and whether this is related to diet, foraging method, pelagic specialism, body mass or phylogenetic position. In our dataset, 182 of the 240 species (76%) contained plastic. Within orders, the highest levels were in pelicans (Pelecaniformes; 67%) and the lowest in penguins (Sphenisciformes; 5%). In our phylogenetically informed analysis, accounting for artefacts of study design (e.g. sample size, year, ocean, source, age class and sampling method), none of the ecological traits we tested had a consistent effect on plastic occurrence. Instead, phylogenetic relatedness was the best predictor in our models, reflecting the tight correlation between seabird phylogenetic groupings and their traits. This suggests that phylogenetic position may serve as a rapid way to identify species likely to accumulate plastic. Future research should focus on developing predictions of plastic accumulation risk for understudied species, implementing standardized methodologies and investigating species-specific morphological and environmental variables that may affect their risk of plastic accumulation.

Biology LettersVol. 22(10)
Natural History Museum (GB), Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), Charles Sturt University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), BirdLife International (KE), University of Oxford (GB), NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Science Museum Group (GB), The London College (GB), Science Oxford (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.