Exploring the Role of AI in Social Media Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Selected South Asian Countries and the Actions of Major Technology Platforms

This article examines the extent to which private technology companies bear responsibility for respecting human rights, particularly freedom of expression, when governing social media content through artificial intelligence (AI), and how that responsibility relates to the legal obligations of States. It focuses on the rule-of-law complexities created by the interaction between territorially based public regulation and transnational platform governance. Through a comparative analysis of domestic law and platform practice, the article assesses how AI-mediated content moderation affects online expression. The revised analysis is limited to India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan as selected comparative cases; it distinguishes State duties from the corporate responsibility to respect human rights, and treats AI-mediated moderation as including automated detection, classification, recommendation, down-ranking, removal and account restrictions. It proposes a seven-element human-rights test for AI-mediated moderation: legality, legitimate aim, necessity, proportionality, transparency, procedural fairness and effective remedy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laws
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15050138
Primary Topic
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Role of AI in Social Media Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Selected South Asian Countries and the Actions of Major Technology Platforms

Upal Aditya Oikya, Sadam Mohammad Awaisheh, Anas Abdelrahman, Taskin Tanika
Laws
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
article

Exploring the Role of AI in Social Media Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Selected South Asian Countries and the Actions of Major Technology Platforms

Upal Aditya Oikya, Sadam Mohammad Awaisheh, Anas Abdelrahman, Taskin Tanika
article en

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which private technology companies bear responsibility for respecting human rights, particularly freedom of expression, when governing social media content through artificial intelligence (AI), and how that responsibility relates to the legal obligations of States. It focuses on the rule-of-law complexities created by the interaction between territorially based public regulation and transnational platform governance. Through a comparative analysis of domestic law and platform practice, the article assesses how AI-mediated content moderation affects online expression. The revised analysis is limited to India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan as selected comparative cases; it distinguishes State duties from the corporate responsibility to respect human rights, and treats AI-mediated moderation as including automated detection, classification, recommendation, down-ranking, removal and account restrictions. It proposes a seven-element human-rights test for AI-mediated moderation: legality, legitimate aim, necessity, proportionality, transparency, procedural fairness and effective remedy.

LawsVol. 15(5)
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), BRAC University (BD), University of Tabuk (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.