Physiotherapists’ perspectives on the potential role of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in practice: a qualitative study

Background With chronic conditions and multimorbidity rising, physiotherapists play an important role in supporting patients’ well-being. However, delivering person-centered care is challenging. The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool may help address this. This study explores physiotherapists’ perspectives regarding the (potential) use of the ABCC tool in primary care physiotherapy.Methods 19 interviews were conducted with physiotherapists (4 with and 15 without prior experience using the ABCC tool). Interviews explored current practice, use of and experiences with the ABCC tool, perspectives on (the applicability of) this tool, and support needs for optimal use. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using conventional and directed content analysis.Results Regardless of experience, most participants reported that existing assessments insufficiently capture the multidimensional impact of chronic conditions. While experienced users valued the ABCC tool for providing a comprehensive assessment and a visual representation that facilitates understanding, dialogue, and patient engagement, inexperienced participants anticipated similar potential benefits for clinical practice. Concerns were raised regarding the duplication of existing questionnaires and the incomplete integration into existing electronic health records. These concerns could potentially lead to an increased workload, alongside potential patient questionnaire fatigue. With regard to the training aspect, there was a divergence of needs amongst the participants.Conclusion Physiotherapists valued the ABCC tool for supporting person-centered care. Despite some practical considerations regarding implementation, experienced users reported generally positive experiences, while inexperienced participants anticipated potential benefits for clinical practice. To realise this theoretical potential in practice, it will be essential to involve key stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Physiotherapy
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2026.2746588
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiotherapists’ perspectives on the potential role of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in practice: a qualitative study

Marcia Vervloet, Ramon P G Ottenheijm, Loraine H.L. Peters, Valerie H. J. Debie et al.
European Journal of Physiotherapy
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Physiotherapists’ perspectives on the potential role of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool in practice: a qualitative study

Marcia Vervloet, Ramon P G Ottenheijm, Loraine H.L. Peters, Valerie H. J. Debie, Annerika H. M. Gidding-Slok, Jean W. M. Muris, Ed Deen, Onno C. P. van Schayck
article en

Abstract

Background With chronic conditions and multimorbidity rising, physiotherapists play an important role in supporting patients’ well-being. However, delivering person-centered care is challenging. The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool may help address this. This study explores physiotherapists’ perspectives regarding the (potential) use of the ABCC tool in primary care physiotherapy.Methods 19 interviews were conducted with physiotherapists (4 with and 15 without prior experience using the ABCC tool). Interviews explored current practice, use of and experiences with the ABCC tool, perspectives on (the applicability of) this tool, and support needs for optimal use. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using conventional and directed content analysis.Results Regardless of experience, most participants reported that existing assessments insufficiently capture the multidimensional impact of chronic conditions. While experienced users valued the ABCC tool for providing a comprehensive assessment and a visual representation that facilitates understanding, dialogue, and patient engagement, inexperienced participants anticipated similar potential benefits for clinical practice. Concerns were raised regarding the duplication of existing questionnaires and the incomplete integration into existing electronic health records. These concerns could potentially lead to an increased workload, alongside potential patient questionnaire fatigue. With regard to the training aspect, there was a divergence of needs amongst the participants.Conclusion Physiotherapists valued the ABCC tool for supporting person-centered care. Despite some practical considerations regarding implementation, experienced users reported generally positive experiences, while inexperienced participants anticipated potential benefits for clinical practice. To realise this theoretical potential in practice, it will be essential to involve key stakeholders.

European Journal of Physiotherapy
Maastricht University (NL), Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL), Care and Public Health Research Institute (NL)
Arab-British Chamber of Commerce, ZonMw, Dutch Arthritis Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.