Body Weight Changes and Exploratory Metabolic Outcomes During Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Treatment: A Real-World Longitudinal Cohort Study from Türkiye

Background/Objectives: Comparative real-world evidence on early body-weight changes during semaglutide and tirzepatide treatment remains limited, particularly in populations with unequal and irregularly timed follow-up. To compare longitudinal percentage changes in body weight between adults initiating semaglutide and those initiating tirzepatide and to describe changes in anthropometric measures, weight-loss responses, and exploratory metabolic outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, real-world longitudinal cohort study included adults aged ≥18 years initiating semaglutide or tirzepatide for weight management, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 or ≥27 kg/m2 with a weight-related comorbidity. Patients with type 2 diabetes and concomitant obesity were eligible. Participants were naïve to incretin-based therapy; pregnancy, previous bariatric surgery, and active malignancy were exclusion criteria. Anthropometric and laboratory data were extracted from clinical records. Percentage body-weight change over days 1–230 was analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model incorporating exact follow-up time and adjusting for age, sex, baseline BMI, and diabetes status. Scheduled-visit and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: The cohort included 184 patients: 94 (51.1%) receiving semaglutide and 90 (48.9%) receiving tirzepatide. Overall, mean age was 41.7 ± 12.0 years, baseline weight was 97.0 ± 17.9 kg, and 139 patients (75.5%) were female. The longitudinal analysis included 345 measurements from 148 patients (80.4%). The treatment-by-time interaction was significant (p = 0.002). Adjusted weight changes with semaglutide versus tirzepatide were −3.39% versus −4.44% at month 1 (p = 0.116), −8.38% versus −11.52% at month 3 (p < 0.001), and −14.40% versus −15.06% at month 6 (p = 0.699). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings. Only four tirzepatide-treated patients had measurements within the month 6 visit window; therefore, the month 6 estimate for this group relied primarily on the model and requires cautious interpretation. Conclusions: Both semaglutide and tirzepatide were associated with early reductions in body weight. Tirzepatide was associated with larger model-adjusted weight loss at month 3 (between-group difference, −3.14 percentage points; 95% CI, −4.55 to −1.74; p < 0.001), whereas no statistically significant between-group difference was observed at month 1 (p = 0.116). Only four tirzepatide-treated patients had measurements within the month 6 visit window, limiting the reliability of this comparison. Longer-term comparisons require cohorts with more balanced follow-up and more observations at later time points.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15207876
Primary Topic
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body Weight Changes and Exploratory Metabolic Outcomes During Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Treatment: A Real-World Longitudinal Cohort Study from Türkiye

İrem Kıraç Utku, Esra DEMİR, Hanişe Ozkan, Alp Abbasoglu et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
article

Body Weight Changes and Exploratory Metabolic Outcomes During Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Treatment: A Real-World Longitudinal Cohort Study from Türkiye

İrem Kıraç Utku, Esra DEMİR, Hanişe Ozkan, Alp Abbasoglu, Murat Kayır
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Comparative real-world evidence on early body-weight changes during semaglutide and tirzepatide treatment remains limited, particularly in populations with unequal and irregularly timed follow-up. To compare longitudinal percentage changes in body weight between adults initiating semaglutide and those initiating tirzepatide and to describe changes in anthropometric measures, weight-loss responses, and exploratory metabolic outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, real-world longitudinal cohort study included adults aged ≥18 years initiating semaglutide or tirzepatide for weight management, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 or ≥27 kg/m2 with a weight-related comorbidity. Patients with type 2 diabetes and concomitant obesity were eligible. Participants were naïve to incretin-based therapy; pregnancy, previous bariatric surgery, and active malignancy were exclusion criteria. Anthropometric and laboratory data were extracted from clinical records. Percentage body-weight change over days 1–230 was analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model incorporating exact follow-up time and adjusting for age, sex, baseline BMI, and diabetes status. Scheduled-visit and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: The cohort included 184 patients: 94 (51.1%) receiving semaglutide and 90 (48.9%) receiving tirzepatide. Overall, mean age was 41.7 ± 12.0 years, baseline weight was 97.0 ± 17.9 kg, and 139 patients (75.5%) were female. The longitudinal analysis included 345 measurements from 148 patients (80.4%). The treatment-by-time interaction was significant (p = 0.002). Adjusted weight changes with semaglutide versus tirzepatide were −3.39% versus −4.44% at month 1 (p = 0.116), −8.38% versus −11.52% at month 3 (p < 0.001), and −14.40% versus −15.06% at month 6 (p = 0.699). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings. Only four tirzepatide-treated patients had measurements within the month 6 visit window; therefore, the month 6 estimate for this group relied primarily on the model and requires cautious interpretation. Conclusions: Both semaglutide and tirzepatide were associated with early reductions in body weight. Tirzepatide was associated with larger model-adjusted weight loss at month 3 (between-group difference, −3.14 percentage points; 95% CI, −4.55 to −1.74; p < 0.001), whereas no statistically significant between-group difference was observed at month 1 (p = 0.116). Only four tirzepatide-treated patients had measurements within the month 6 visit window, limiting the reliability of this comparison. Longer-term comparisons require cohorts with more balanced follow-up and more observations at later time points.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(20)
Istanbul Medipol University (TR), İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.