Global Assessment and Error Budget of EarthCARE Column Aerosol Optical Depth: Physical Limits and Quantitative Mitigation

Abstract The Earth Cloud Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) provides critical spaceborne high spectral resolution LiDAR observations for global aerosol profiling. However, integrating these vertically resolved aerosol extinction coefficient profiles into column Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) introduces systematic biases from physical observation boundaries, which currently lack global validation and quantitative attribution. This study presents a global assessment and error budget of EarthCARE 355 nm column AOD using solar and lunar AErosol Robotic NETwork measurements from August 2024 to March 2026. Baseline validations demonstrate robust spatiotemporal tracking capabilities (daytime R = 0.873, nighttime R = 0.859) and physically consistent independently retrieved LiDAR ratio distributions across coarse and fine mode aerosol regimes. Nevertheless, cross‐framework comparisons show that complex absorbing mixtures are frequently assigned to fine mode dominant EarthCARE categories. Concurrently, a pervasive systematic underestimation persists globally (daytime MB = −0.060, nighttime MB = −0.073). Mechanistically, this underestimation is associated with three distinct physical limits: near‐surface clutter truncation (0–400 m), free‐tropospheric signal‐to‐noise ratio detection limits, and attenuation‐induced sampling biases under extreme aerosol loading (AOD > 1.0). Applying a constant boundary‐layer geometric extrapolation mitigates the near‐surface truncation, reducing the daytime MB by ∼40% (to −0.036) and recovering the linear regression slope from 0.67 to 0.77 while preserving high R. Further, compensating for free‐tropospheric background detection limit reduces the ubiquitous underestimation by an additional ∼17% (+0.010). This physically based error‐budget framework quantifies the major recoverable contributions and characterizes the factors associated with the remaining bias, providing a robust basis for optimizing future spaceborne LiDAR retrievals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026jd048195
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Assessment and Error Budget of EarthCARE Column Aerosol Optical Depth: Physical Limits and Quantitative Mitigation

Lunche Wang, Yi Wang, J. Xiong, Minghui Tao et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Global Assessment and Error Budget of EarthCARE Column Aerosol Optical Depth: Physical Limits and Quantitative Mitigation

Lunche Wang, Yi Wang, J. Xiong, Minghui Tao, Wenhui Dong, Yanyu Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Earth Cloud Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) provides critical spaceborne high spectral resolution LiDAR observations for global aerosol profiling. However, integrating these vertically resolved aerosol extinction coefficient profiles into column Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) introduces systematic biases from physical observation boundaries, which currently lack global validation and quantitative attribution. This study presents a global assessment and error budget of EarthCARE 355 nm column AOD using solar and lunar AErosol Robotic NETwork measurements from August 2024 to March 2026. Baseline validations demonstrate robust spatiotemporal tracking capabilities (daytime R = 0.873, nighttime R = 0.859) and physically consistent independently retrieved LiDAR ratio distributions across coarse and fine mode aerosol regimes. Nevertheless, cross‐framework comparisons show that complex absorbing mixtures are frequently assigned to fine mode dominant EarthCARE categories. Concurrently, a pervasive systematic underestimation persists globally (daytime MB = −0.060, nighttime MB = −0.073). Mechanistically, this underestimation is associated with three distinct physical limits: near‐surface clutter truncation (0–400 m), free‐tropospheric signal‐to‐noise ratio detection limits, and attenuation‐induced sampling biases under extreme aerosol loading (AOD > 1.0). Applying a constant boundary‐layer geometric extrapolation mitigates the near‐surface truncation, reducing the daytime MB by ∼40% (to −0.036) and recovering the linear regression slope from 0.67 to 0.77 while preserving high R. Further, compensating for free‐tropospheric background detection limit reduces the ubiquitous underestimation by an additional ∼17% (+0.010). This physically based error‐budget framework quantifies the major recoverable contributions and characterizes the factors associated with the remaining bias, providing a robust basis for optimizing future spaceborne LiDAR retrievals.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(20)
China University of Geosciences (CN), Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.