Treatment-Stratified Immune–Inflammatory Trajectories and Early Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Systemic Therapy

Background: Systemic therapy outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain heterogeneous, and treatment selection is still largely guided by clinical eligibility rather than dynamic biologic response. We evaluated whether accessible standard-of-care immunophenotypic and immune–inflammatory markers, tumor-marker kinetics, and immune-context variables could generate treatment-stratified early response signals. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 153 unique patients with HCC, each contributing one systemic therapy episode. First on-treatment imaging response was classified as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Routine immune-cell indices, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were evaluated at baseline and early post-treatment timepoints. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) kinetics and overall survival were analyzed descriptively. Results: A total of 153 patients were included: 124 received immunotherapy-based therapy and 29 received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Overall objective response rate was 26.8%, disease control rate was 56.2%, and progression occurred in 43.8%. AFP trajectory separated responder from non-responder phenotypes, supporting the value of dynamic marker change. Treatment-stratified trajectories revealed distinct patterns: among immunotherapy-treated patients, Week 2 SII increase was associated with progression at first on-treatment imaging (median log2 ratio 0.17 vs. −0.24 for progression vs. non-progression; p = 0.026), whereas TKI response was associated with lymphocyte expansion and decline in neutrophil-dominant inflammatory indices. Conclusions: Routine immune–inflammatory trajectories, particularly early SII change, may provide clinically relevant treatment-stratified response signals in patients with HCC receiving systemic therapy. These findings support interpreting standard clinical markers as evolving biologic trajectories rather than isolated prognostic scores and provide a practical foundation for future biomarker-informed treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203329
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment-Stratified Immune–Inflammatory Trajectories and Early Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Systemic Therapy

Walid S. Ayoub, Manaf Alsudaney, Jihye Lim, Naomy Kim et al.
Diagnostics
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Treatment-Stratified Immune–Inflammatory Trajectories and Early Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Systemic Therapy

Walid S. Ayoub, Manaf Alsudaney, Jihye Lim, Naomy Kim, Pin‐Jung Chen, Shahzeb Imran, Andrew Hendifar, Daniel Legaspi, Ashley Kim, Osama Khattab, Jason Liu, Fadhil Jamil, Angelica E. Alderete, Ekaterina Koltsova, Ju Dong Yang
article en

Abstract

Background: Systemic therapy outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain heterogeneous, and treatment selection is still largely guided by clinical eligibility rather than dynamic biologic response. We evaluated whether accessible standard-of-care immunophenotypic and immune–inflammatory markers, tumor-marker kinetics, and immune-context variables could generate treatment-stratified early response signals. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 153 unique patients with HCC, each contributing one systemic therapy episode. First on-treatment imaging response was classified as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Routine immune-cell indices, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were evaluated at baseline and early post-treatment timepoints. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) kinetics and overall survival were analyzed descriptively. Results: A total of 153 patients were included: 124 received immunotherapy-based therapy and 29 received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Overall objective response rate was 26.8%, disease control rate was 56.2%, and progression occurred in 43.8%. AFP trajectory separated responder from non-responder phenotypes, supporting the value of dynamic marker change. Treatment-stratified trajectories revealed distinct patterns: among immunotherapy-treated patients, Week 2 SII increase was associated with progression at first on-treatment imaging (median log2 ratio 0.17 vs. −0.24 for progression vs. non-progression; p = 0.026), whereas TKI response was associated with lymphocyte expansion and decline in neutrophil-dominant inflammatory indices. Conclusions: Routine immune–inflammatory trajectories, particularly early SII change, may provide clinically relevant treatment-stratified response signals in patients with HCC receiving systemic therapy. These findings support interpreting standard clinical markers as evolving biologic trajectories rather than isolated prognostic scores and provide a practical foundation for future biomarker-informed treatment strategies.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(20)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US), The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Sinai Health System (US), Catholic University of Korea (KR), American University of Antigua (AG)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.