Diversity in opportunity sets: perspective from preferences satisficing

Abstract This paper introduces a ranking over opportunity sets based on preferences satisficing: a set satisfices a preference if and only if there exists an element in the set that is considered good enough to meet the preference, and sets are ranked by the number of satisficed preferences. I compare this framework with existing models of ranking over sets and show that, when preferences are not exogenously given, it is characterized by two axioms identical to those in Kreps (1979), who analyzed rankings over sets from the perspective of preferences maximization. This result indicates that we cannot distinguish whether the ranking over sets is generated according to preferences maximization or preferences satisficing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-026-01680-8
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity in opportunity sets: perspective from preferences satisficing

Wen-An Tseng
Social Choice and Welfare
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Diversity in opportunity sets: perspective from preferences satisficing

Wen-An Tseng
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper introduces a ranking over opportunity sets based on preferences satisficing: a set satisfices a preference if and only if there exists an element in the set that is considered good enough to meet the preference, and sets are ranked by the number of satisficed preferences. I compare this framework with existing models of ranking over sets and show that, when preferences are not exogenously given, it is characterized by two axioms identical to those in Kreps (1979), who analyzed rankings over sets from the perspective of preferences maximization. This result indicates that we cannot distinguish whether the ranking over sets is generated according to preferences maximization or preferences satisficing.

Social Choice and Welfare
National Taiwan University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.