The Participant Voice: Insights into Improving Research Engagement and Retention Across a Multidisciplinary Research Center

Participant recruitment and retention remain significant research challenges with implications for scientific validity, fair participant selection, and social value. While recruitment strategies are well-studied, participant feedback, a form of community engagement encouraged in research ethics guidance (e.g., CIOMS, 2016), is less often used to improve participant experiences and retention. This pilot study surveyed 25 former participants (20 completers, 5 non-completers) from four prior trials at a human health research center towards developing an online participant feedback survey to use across the entire center. Phone interviews were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Respondents reported mostly positive experiences with the mobile lab and staff. Participation motivations included altruism, curiosity, compensation, and therapeutic potential. Non-completers cited inconvenience. Findings demonstrate the value of participant feedback and informed the development of an online, center-wide feedback tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646261488472
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Participant Voice: Insights into Improving Research Engagement and Retention Across a Multidisciplinary Research Center

Austin Drake, Angela D. Bryan, L. Cinnamon Bidwell, Renée Martin‐Willett et al.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

The Participant Voice: Insights into Improving Research Engagement and Retention Across a Multidisciplinary Research Center

Austin Drake, Angela D. Bryan, L. Cinnamon Bidwell, Renée Martin‐Willett, Elicia Azua, Gregory Giordano
article en

Abstract

Participant recruitment and retention remain significant research challenges with implications for scientific validity, fair participant selection, and social value. While recruitment strategies are well-studied, participant feedback, a form of community engagement encouraged in research ethics guidance (e.g., CIOMS, 2016), is less often used to improve participant experiences and retention. This pilot study surveyed 25 former participants (20 completers, 5 non-completers) from four prior trials at a human health research center towards developing an online participant feedback survey to use across the entire center. Phone interviews were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Respondents reported mostly positive experiences with the mobile lab and staff. Participation motivations included altruism, curiosity, compensation, and therapeutic potential. Non-completers cited inconvenience. Findings demonstrate the value of participant feedback and informed the development of an online, center-wide feedback tool.

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
National Institute on Aging, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.