Investigating Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Ideation and Attempts in Bi+ Youth: A Multi-Method Study

Bi+ youth face unique forms of minority stress, yet little is known about how these relate to their high rates of suicidality. This multi-method study takes an exploratory approach to examine risk and protective factors linked to suicidal ideation and attempts among bi+ youth. Quantitative survey data came from Dutch bi+ youth aged 16–22 (M age = 18.71, SD = 1.83). We conducted logistic regression on lifetime suicidal ideation (N = 1,275) and attempts (N = 1,274), including risk and protective factors, as well as interaction effects between sexual orientation, gender identity, and risk/protective factors. To contextualize the quantitative findings, 15 interviews with bi+ youth with a history of suicidality were conducted and thematically analyzed. Quantitatively, stigmatization and binegativity-related prejudice were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Social support, support-seeking coping, and resilience were linked with lower suicidal ideation. The association between erasure and suicidality varied by sexual identity. Qualitatively, stigmatization and binegativity-related prejudice involved peers perceiving bi+ youth as ‘strange,’ sexualizing their identities, and assuming incapability of having stable relationships. Findings highlight the need for inclusive mental health interventions that address experiences of bi+ youth and improve protective factors, including social support, coping strategies, and resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bisexuality
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2026.2731622
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Ideation and Attempts in Bi+ Youth: A Multi-Method Study

Kirsty A. Clark, Henny Bos, Diana D. van Bergen, John B. F. de Wit et al.
Journal of Bisexuality
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Investigating Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Ideation and Attempts in Bi+ Youth: A Multi-Method Study

Kirsty A. Clark, Henny Bos, Diana D. van Bergen, John B. F. de Wit, Laura Baams, Larissa Totic
article en

Abstract

Bi+ youth face unique forms of minority stress, yet little is known about how these relate to their high rates of suicidality. This multi-method study takes an exploratory approach to examine risk and protective factors linked to suicidal ideation and attempts among bi+ youth. Quantitative survey data came from Dutch bi+ youth aged 16–22 (M age = 18.71, SD = 1.83). We conducted logistic regression on lifetime suicidal ideation (N = 1,275) and attempts (N = 1,274), including risk and protective factors, as well as interaction effects between sexual orientation, gender identity, and risk/protective factors. To contextualize the quantitative findings, 15 interviews with bi+ youth with a history of suicidality were conducted and thematically analyzed. Quantitatively, stigmatization and binegativity-related prejudice were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Social support, support-seeking coping, and resilience were linked with lower suicidal ideation. The association between erasure and suicidality varied by sexual identity. Qualitatively, stigmatization and binegativity-related prejudice involved peers perceiving bi+ youth as ‘strange,’ sexualizing their identities, and assuming incapability of having stable relationships. Findings highlight the need for inclusive mental health interventions that address experiences of bi+ youth and improve protective factors, including social support, coping strategies, and resilience.

Journal of Bisexuality
University of Groningen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Vanderbilt University (US), University of Amsterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.