Rainfed pulse–pulse and pulse–oilseed intercrops: yield, nutrient uptake, and risk buffering

Context Intercropping can improve resource-use efficiency, yield stability, and profitability, but pulse–pulse intercrops remain poorly studied in mechanised dryland systems. Aims To determine whether functional complementarity among pulse–pulse and pulse–oilseed crops improves yield, nutrient uptake, phenological risk buffering, and profitability under rainfed conditions. Methods Field experiments conducted in southern Australia from 2019 to 2024 compared monocultures with pulse–pulse (lentil–faba bean; faba bean–field pea) and oilseed–pulse (canola–field pea, canola–faba bean, linseed–chickpea) intercrops across locations and sowing dates. Key results Functionally divergent intercrops such as canola–field pea recorded land equivalent ratios (LER) of >1 and nutrient uptake LERs for nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur that exceeded unity. By contrast, chickpea–linseed and lentil–faba bean intercrops underperformed with LERs of <1. Faba bean–field pea mixtures yielded similarly to or better than sole crops across environments, with mean LERs near or above 1. Field pea performed better in low-rainfall environments, whereas faba bean performed better in favourable conditions. These complementary responses reflected phenological divergence, with faba bean flowering earlier and field pea maturing sooner. Grain protein concentration remained stable across faba bean–field pea mixtures and was environment-driven. Gross margins were competitive and stable, with some mixtures outperforming monocultures in both yield and profitability. Conclusions Pulse–pulse intercropping offers a low-barrier diversification strategy for mechanised dryland systems. Functional complementarity underpinned agronomic and economic benefits, with nutrient uptake advantages greatest in functionally distinct oilseed–pulse intercrops. Implications Intercropping can improve productivity, profitability, and resilience in low-input dryland systems, although benefits depend strongly on species selection and functional contrast.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/cp26203
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rainfed pulse–pulse and pulse–oilseed intercrops: yield, nutrient uptake, and risk buffering

Víctor O. Sadras, Terry J. Rose, Lachlan Lake, Abraham Gibson et al.
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Rainfed pulse–pulse and pulse–oilseed intercrops: yield, nutrient uptake, and risk buffering

Víctor O. Sadras, Terry J. Rose, Lachlan Lake, Abraham Gibson, Rebekah Allen, Stefan Schmitt
article en

Abstract

Context Intercropping can improve resource-use efficiency, yield stability, and profitability, but pulse–pulse intercrops remain poorly studied in mechanised dryland systems. Aims To determine whether functional complementarity among pulse–pulse and pulse–oilseed crops improves yield, nutrient uptake, phenological risk buffering, and profitability under rainfed conditions. Methods Field experiments conducted in southern Australia from 2019 to 2024 compared monocultures with pulse–pulse (lentil–faba bean; faba bean–field pea) and oilseed–pulse (canola–field pea, canola–faba bean, linseed–chickpea) intercrops across locations and sowing dates. Key results Functionally divergent intercrops such as canola–field pea recorded land equivalent ratios (LER) of >1 and nutrient uptake LERs for nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur that exceeded unity. By contrast, chickpea–linseed and lentil–faba bean intercrops underperformed with LERs of <1. Faba bean–field pea mixtures yielded similarly to or better than sole crops across environments, with mean LERs near or above 1. Field pea performed better in low-rainfall environments, whereas faba bean performed better in favourable conditions. These complementary responses reflected phenological divergence, with faba bean flowering earlier and field pea maturing sooner. Grain protein concentration remained stable across faba bean–field pea mixtures and was environment-driven. Gross margins were competitive and stable, with some mixtures outperforming monocultures in both yield and profitability. Conclusions Pulse–pulse intercropping offers a low-barrier diversification strategy for mechanised dryland systems. Functional complementarity underpinned agronomic and economic benefits, with nutrient uptake advantages greatest in functionally distinct oilseed–pulse intercrops. Implications Intercropping can improve productivity, profitability, and resilience in low-input dryland systems, although benefits depend strongly on species selection and functional contrast.

Australian Journal of Agricultural ResearchVol. 77(10)
Flinders University (AU), South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), Southern Cross University (AU)
Zero hunger, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.