Diagnosing and correcting openet satellite evapotranspiration across us climate zones: Error decomposition, explainable AI, and uncertainty quantification

Satellite evapotranspiration (ET) from the OpenET platform supports water resource management across the United States but exhibits biases that vary by climate. While machine learning (ML) can improve satellite ET accuracy, prior studies report aggregate metrics without explaining how corrections work or providing operational uncertainty quantification. This study applies an XGBoost correction framework integrating OpenET satellite outputs with ground meteorological observations from 22 AmeriFlux cropland eddy covariance sites across six Köppen climate zones. The framework achieved 41.9% RMSE improvement over OpenET, while a configuration excluding all ground meteorological inputs still achieved 28.5% improvement. Error decomposition revealed that the dominant correction mechanism shifts seasonally: summer corrections were driven primarily by bias removal (61.3% of improvement), reflecting systematic overestimation during peak ET, while winter corrections were driven by variance reduction (96.8%), addressing satellite noise from cloud contamination. Across climates, humid zones improved primarily through variance reduction (68–81%), while water limited zones, including BSk and dry-summer Csa sites, benefited more from bias correction (40–52%). SHAP analysis stratified by climate yielded patterns consistent with these mechanisms. Leave-one-site-out cross-validation indicated strong transferability in humid climates (Dwb R² = 0.82) but limited generalization in BSk sites (R² = −0.30), while leave-one-cluster-out validation provided a more conservative spatial-transferability estimate by accounting for colocated site clusters. Conformal prediction provided empirical uncertainty quantification: constant-width intervals achieved 92.6% overall coverage, while climate-adaptive intervals produced environment specific uncertainty bounds ranging from ±0.81 to ±2.13 mm/day across climates. This framework provides a pathway toward operational ET correction with uncertainty bounds and diagnostic insights for satellite algorithm improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111524
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnosing and correcting openet satellite evapotranspiration across us climate zones: Error decomposition, explainable AI, and uncertainty quantification

Luciano Alves de Oliveira, Mohammad Kian Golkar
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Diagnosing and correcting openet satellite evapotranspiration across us climate zones: Error decomposition, explainable AI, and uncertainty quantification

Luciano Alves de Oliveira, Mohammad Kian Golkar
article en

Abstract

Satellite evapotranspiration (ET) from the OpenET platform supports water resource management across the United States but exhibits biases that vary by climate. While machine learning (ML) can improve satellite ET accuracy, prior studies report aggregate metrics without explaining how corrections work or providing operational uncertainty quantification. This study applies an XGBoost correction framework integrating OpenET satellite outputs with ground meteorological observations from 22 AmeriFlux cropland eddy covariance sites across six Köppen climate zones. The framework achieved 41.9% RMSE improvement over OpenET, while a configuration excluding all ground meteorological inputs still achieved 28.5% improvement. Error decomposition revealed that the dominant correction mechanism shifts seasonally: summer corrections were driven primarily by bias removal (61.3% of improvement), reflecting systematic overestimation during peak ET, while winter corrections were driven by variance reduction (96.8%), addressing satellite noise from cloud contamination. Across climates, humid zones improved primarily through variance reduction (68–81%), while water limited zones, including BSk and dry-summer Csa sites, benefited more from bias correction (40–52%). SHAP analysis stratified by climate yielded patterns consistent with these mechanisms. Leave-one-site-out cross-validation indicated strong transferability in humid climates (Dwb R² = 0.82) but limited generalization in BSk sites (R² = −0.30), while leave-one-cluster-out validation provided a more conservative spatial-transferability estimate by accounting for colocated site clusters. Conformal prediction provided empirical uncertainty quantification: constant-width intervals achieved 92.6% overall coverage, while climate-adaptive intervals produced environment specific uncertainty bounds ranging from ±0.81 to ±2.13 mm/day across climates. This framework provides a pathway toward operational ET correction with uncertainty bounds and diagnostic insights for satellite algorithm improvement.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 391
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.