Arthroscopic Bankart versus the open Latarjet procedure for anterior–inferior shoulder instability in young males: a randomised controlled trial with minimum 5-year follow-up

Objective To compare arthroscopic Bankart repair with the open Latarjet procedure in the treatment of anterior–inferior shoulder instability in young male patients. Methods A multicentre randomised controlled trial was conducted in orthopaedic departments at eight public hospitals in Finland. A total of 122 male patients (mean age 21 years, range 16–25) with anterior–inferior shoulder instability were randomised to undergo either arthroscopic Bankart repair or the open Latarjet procedure. The coprimary outcomes were recurrence of instability and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) at 5 years. The secondary outcomes included incidence of revision surgery, return to sports and progression of osteoarthritis on plain radiographs. Results At 5-year follow-up, 87 of 122 patients (71%) were available for analyses. Redislocations occurred in 16 of 62 patients (26%) in the Bankart group and 3 of 60 patients (5%) in the Latarjet group (p=0.004). Revision surgery was performed in 9 of 62 patients in the Bankart group and in 0 of 60 patients in the Latarjet group. Model-estimated mean WOSI at follow-up was 85.3 and 86.3 in the Bankart and the Latarjet groups, respectively (p=0.77). Among patients participating in competitive sports preoperatively with available follow-up data, return to previous level was achieved by 2 of 10 patients (20%) in the Bankart group and 5 of 7 patients (71%) in the Latarjet group (p=0.0195). Follow-up plain radiographs were available for 70 patients (40 in the Bankart and 30 in the Latarjet group). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the progression of osteoarthritis on plain radiographs. Conclusion The open Latarjet procedure was associated with significantly lower rates of redislocation and revision surgery compared with arthroscopic Bankart repair, while patient-reported outcomes did not differ between groups at 5 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2025-110726
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arthroscopic Bankart versus the open Latarjet procedure for anterior–inferior shoulder instability in young males: a randomised controlled trial with minimum 5-year follow-up

Milja Holstila, Juha Kukkonen, Tommi Kauko, Simo Miettinen et al.
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Arthroscopic Bankart versus the open Latarjet procedure for anterior–inferior shoulder instability in young males: a randomised controlled trial with minimum 5-year follow-up

Milja Holstila, Juha Kukkonen, Tommi Kauko, Simo Miettinen, Juha Paloneva, Ville Äärimaa, Tapio Flinkkilä, Janne Lehtinen
article en

Abstract

Objective To compare arthroscopic Bankart repair with the open Latarjet procedure in the treatment of anterior–inferior shoulder instability in young male patients. Methods A multicentre randomised controlled trial was conducted in orthopaedic departments at eight public hospitals in Finland. A total of 122 male patients (mean age 21 years, range 16–25) with anterior–inferior shoulder instability were randomised to undergo either arthroscopic Bankart repair or the open Latarjet procedure. The coprimary outcomes were recurrence of instability and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) at 5 years. The secondary outcomes included incidence of revision surgery, return to sports and progression of osteoarthritis on plain radiographs. Results At 5-year follow-up, 87 of 122 patients (71%) were available for analyses. Redislocations occurred in 16 of 62 patients (26%) in the Bankart group and 3 of 60 patients (5%) in the Latarjet group (p=0.004). Revision surgery was performed in 9 of 62 patients in the Bankart group and in 0 of 60 patients in the Latarjet group. Model-estimated mean WOSI at follow-up was 85.3 and 86.3 in the Bankart and the Latarjet groups, respectively (p=0.77). Among patients participating in competitive sports preoperatively with available follow-up data, return to previous level was achieved by 2 of 10 patients (20%) in the Bankart group and 5 of 7 patients (71%) in the Latarjet group (p=0.0195). Follow-up plain radiographs were available for 70 patients (40 in the Bankart and 30 in the Latarjet group). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the progression of osteoarthritis on plain radiographs. Conclusion The open Latarjet procedure was associated with significantly lower rates of redislocation and revision surgery compared with arthroscopic Bankart repair, while patient-reported outcomes did not differ between groups at 5 years.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
University of Turku (FI), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Turku University Hospital (FI), Kuopio University Hospital (FI), Satakunta Central Hospital (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Varsinais-Suomen Sairaanhoitopiiri (FI), Central Finland Health Care District (FI), Hatanpää Hospital (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Turun Yliopistollisen Keskussairaalan Koulutus- ja Tutkimussäätiö, Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.