Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding dentine hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study among dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen

Abstract Background/aim Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) is a common clinical condition characterized by short, sharp pain originating from exposed dentine. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding DH among dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 402 dentists and specialists in Sana'a from July to August 2025. A validated 29-item questionnaire assessed demographics, knowledge, attitudes, clinical practices, perceived barriers, and preventive practices. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests with Cramer's V for effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for key proportions. Results A total of 402 of 440 submitted questionnaires (91.4%) were complete and included in the analysis. Participants demonstrated moderate DH knowledge; 28.1% (95% CI: 24.0–32.5%) scored "good." The hydrodynamic theory was known by 57.2% (95% CI: 52.3–62.0%), but misconceptions about systemic factors persisted (44.3%). Higher knowledge was associated with female sex (χ 2 = 11.13, p = 0.004, V = 0.17) and postgraduate qualifications (χ 2 = 19.24, p = 0.014, V = 0.16). Attitudes were generally positive: 61.2% (95% CI: 56.3–65.9%) acknowledged DH's impact on quality of life, but only 36.6% (95% CI: 32.0–41.5%) felt very confident in managing DH. Diagnosis relied mainly on patient history (89.3%; 95% CI: 85.8–92.1%). Management focused on identifying risk factors (73.6%; 95% CI: 69.0–77.8%). Fluoride varnish was the most commonly used treatment (75.9%; 95% CI: 71.4–80.0%), while lasers were rarely used (13.4%; 95% CI: 10.3–17.2%). Major barriers included diagnostic difficulties (67.2%) and patient non-adherence (49.3%). Most participants (83.6%) desired further DH education. Conclusion Dental professionals in Sana'a demonstrated moderate knowledge and positive attitudes but struggled to translate these into confident, evidence-based practice. The knowledge–practice gap indicates a need for structured educational interventions, including context-based guidelines and improved access to advanced therapies. Owing to convenience sampling and the focus on Sana'a, the findings may not be generalizable to rural areas or other Yemeni governorates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-10144-5
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding dentine hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study among dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen

Mohammed M. Al Moaleem, Salim Algarni, Basem H. AL-Huthaifi, Taghreed Ahmed M Al-Kibsi et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding dentine hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study among dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen

Mohammed M. Al Moaleem, Salim Algarni, Basem H. AL-Huthaifi, Taghreed Ahmed M Al-Kibsi, Emad Mohamed Shaif Shaamala, Haya H. Al kumaim, Lena F. Alsairi, Wejdan T. Al-olofi, Areej A. Alrifaie, Rashed Mohammed Aishan, Abrar A. Al-aswani, Baker M. Abdullah, Reeman A. Zayed, Khalid Aldhorae
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background/aim Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) is a common clinical condition characterized by short, sharp pain originating from exposed dentine. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding DH among dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 402 dentists and specialists in Sana'a from July to August 2025. A validated 29-item questionnaire assessed demographics, knowledge, attitudes, clinical practices, perceived barriers, and preventive practices. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests with Cramer's V for effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for key proportions. Results A total of 402 of 440 submitted questionnaires (91.4%) were complete and included in the analysis. Participants demonstrated moderate DH knowledge; 28.1% (95% CI: 24.0–32.5%) scored "good." The hydrodynamic theory was known by 57.2% (95% CI: 52.3–62.0%), but misconceptions about systemic factors persisted (44.3%). Higher knowledge was associated with female sex (χ 2 = 11.13, p = 0.004, V = 0.17) and postgraduate qualifications (χ 2 = 19.24, p = 0.014, V = 0.16). Attitudes were generally positive: 61.2% (95% CI: 56.3–65.9%) acknowledged DH's impact on quality of life, but only 36.6% (95% CI: 32.0–41.5%) felt very confident in managing DH. Diagnosis relied mainly on patient history (89.3%; 95% CI: 85.8–92.1%). Management focused on identifying risk factors (73.6%; 95% CI: 69.0–77.8%). Fluoride varnish was the most commonly used treatment (75.9%; 95% CI: 71.4–80.0%), while lasers were rarely used (13.4%; 95% CI: 10.3–17.2%). Major barriers included diagnostic difficulties (67.2%) and patient non-adherence (49.3%). Most participants (83.6%) desired further DH education. Conclusion Dental professionals in Sana'a demonstrated moderate knowledge and positive attitudes but struggled to translate these into confident, evidence-based practice. The knowledge–practice gap indicates a need for structured educational interventions, including context-based guidelines and improved access to advanced therapies. Owing to convenience sampling and the focus on Sana'a, the findings may not be generalizable to rural areas or other Yemeni governorates.

BMC Oral Health
Boston University (US), Sana'a University (YE), Thamar University (YE), Najran University (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.