Toward a standard lexicon for ecological forecasting

Unprecedented environmental changes challenge our understanding of the natural world, yet critical environmental decisions are made every day. Ecological forecasting provides a mechanism to inform science‐based decision‐making amid accelerating environmental uncertainties by using foundational forecasting principles to anticipate ecological unknowns. However, as an emerging and interdisciplinary field, ecological forecasting lacks unified terminology, limiting cohesion and hindering communication across other forecasting subdisciplines. Here, we examined current use of common forecasting terms by surveying forecasting professionals ( n = 109) and synthesizing literature trends (Scopus; 1970–2025) and internet search queries (Google Trends; 2004–2024). Our results informed the development of standardized definitions for “forecast”, “prediction”, and “projection”, and illuminated a disconnect between the goal of aiding decision‐making and the inclusion of decision science in the forecasting process. This work promotes participation and growth in ecological forecasting, helping forecasters meet priority end goals by facilitating communication across forecasting disciplines and within forecasting processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70078
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a standard lexicon for ecological forecasting

Mostafa Javadian, Anna R. Sjodin, Alyssa Willson, Laura Super et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
article

Toward a standard lexicon for ecological forecasting

Mostafa Javadian, Anna R. Sjodin, Alyssa Willson, Laura Super, Jody A. Peters, Beth M. Tuschhoff, Cara A. Gallagher, Gretchen L. Stokes, Michael Dietze, Jason S MacLachlan, Abigail SL Lewis, Courtney S Rieb
article en

Abstract

Unprecedented environmental changes challenge our understanding of the natural world, yet critical environmental decisions are made every day. Ecological forecasting provides a mechanism to inform science‐based decision‐making amid accelerating environmental uncertainties by using foundational forecasting principles to anticipate ecological unknowns. However, as an emerging and interdisciplinary field, ecological forecasting lacks unified terminology, limiting cohesion and hindering communication across other forecasting subdisciplines. Here, we examined current use of common forecasting terms by surveying forecasting professionals ( n = 109) and synthesizing literature trends (Scopus; 1970–2025) and internet search queries (Google Trends; 2004–2024). Our results informed the development of standardized definitions for “forecast”, “prediction”, and “projection”, and illuminated a disconnect between the goal of aiding decision‐making and the inclusion of decision science in the forecasting process. This work promotes participation and growth in ecological forecasting, helping forecasters meet priority end goals by facilitating communication across forecasting disciplines and within forecasting processes.

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
College of the Holy Cross (US), University of Notre Dame (US), Boston University (US), Environmental Protection Agency (US), Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Idaho (US), Baylor University (US), University of Potsdam (DE), Environmental Protection Agency (GH), Northern Arizona University (US), Environmental Protection Agency (IE), Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Environmental Biology
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.