Application of a concise video to improve patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in community and academic practice settings

PURPOSE: Tumor genomic testing (TGT) is standard-of-care for most patients with advanced/metastatic cancer. Despite established guidelines, patient education prior to TGT is frequently omitted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact and durability of a concise 3-4 minute video for patient education prior to TGT in community versus academic sites and across cancer types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing standard-of-care TGT were enrolled at a tertiary academic institution in three cohorts: Cohort 1-breast cancer; Cohort 2-lung cancer; Cohort 3-other cancers. Cohort 4 consisted of patients with any cancer type similarly undergoing SOC TGT at one of three community cancer centers. Participants completed survey measures prior to video viewing (T1), immediately post-viewing (T2), and after return of TGT results (T3). Outcome measures included: 1) 10-question objective genomic knowledge/understanding (GKU); 2) 10-question video message-specific knowledge (VMSK); 3) 11-question Trust in Physician/Provider (TIPP); 4) perceptions regarding TGT. RESULTS: A total of 203 participants completed all survey timepoints. Higher baseline GKU and VMSK scores were significantly associated with higher income and greater years of education. For the primary objective, there was a significant and sustained improvement in VMSK from T1:T2:T3 (Poverall p < 0.0001), with no significant change in GKU (p = 0.41) or TIPP (p = 0.73). This trend was consistent within each cohort (all p ≤ 0.0001). Results for four VMSK questions significantly improved, including impact on treatment decisions, incidental germline findings, and insurance coverage of testing. CONCLUSIONS: A concise, 3-4 minute, broadly applicable educational video administered prior to TGT significantly and sustainably improved video message-specific knowledge in diverse cancer types and in academic and community settings. This resource is publicly available at http://www.tumor-testing.com, with a goal to efficiently educate and empower patients regarding TGT while addressing guidelines within the flow of clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05215769.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360611
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of a concise video to improve patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in community and academic practice settings

Carolyn Jean Presley, Heather Hampel, Deloris J. Veney, Tasleem J. Padamsee et al.
PLoS ONE
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Application of a concise video to improve patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in community and academic practice settings

Carolyn Jean Presley, Heather Hampel, Deloris J. Veney, Tasleem J. Padamsee, William Irvin, Amanda Ewart Toland, Daniel G. Stover, Shelly Renee Anstey Hovick, James J. Kim, Michael J. Bishop, Jaden Miller, Lai Wei, Leigha Senter
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumor genomic testing (TGT) is standard-of-care for most patients with advanced/metastatic cancer. Despite established guidelines, patient education prior to TGT is frequently omitted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact and durability of a concise 3-4 minute video for patient education prior to TGT in community versus academic sites and across cancer types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing standard-of-care TGT were enrolled at a tertiary academic institution in three cohorts: Cohort 1-breast cancer; Cohort 2-lung cancer; Cohort 3-other cancers. Cohort 4 consisted of patients with any cancer type similarly undergoing SOC TGT at one of three community cancer centers. Participants completed survey measures prior to video viewing (T1), immediately post-viewing (T2), and after return of TGT results (T3). Outcome measures included: 1) 10-question objective genomic knowledge/understanding (GKU); 2) 10-question video message-specific knowledge (VMSK); 3) 11-question Trust in Physician/Provider (TIPP); 4) perceptions regarding TGT. RESULTS: A total of 203 participants completed all survey timepoints. Higher baseline GKU and VMSK scores were significantly associated with higher income and greater years of education. For the primary objective, there was a significant and sustained improvement in VMSK from T1:T2:T3 (Poverall p < 0.0001), with no significant change in GKU (p = 0.41) or TIPP (p = 0.73). This trend was consistent within each cohort (all p ≤ 0.0001). Results for four VMSK questions significantly improved, including impact on treatment decisions, incidental germline findings, and insurance coverage of testing. CONCLUSIONS: A concise, 3-4 minute, broadly applicable educational video administered prior to TGT significantly and sustainably improved video message-specific knowledge in diverse cancer types and in academic and community settings. This resource is publicly available at http://www.tumor-testing.com, with a goal to efficiently educate and empower patients regarding TGT while addressing guidelines within the flow of clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05215769.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), Bon Secours Mercy Health (US), The Ohio State University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.