A cross-sectional analysis of biopsychosocial distress among oncology patients in Limpopo, South Africa

Abstract Background Cancer is a major global health burden associated with substantial mortality and long-term biopsychosocial challenges. In South Africa, limited oncology infrastructure and inequitable access to cancer care may contribute to delayed diagnosis and increased distress, particularly among patients in rural communities. This study assessed biopsychosocial distress among oncology patients in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Methods A non-experimental, cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study was conducted between October 2017 and January 2018 among 207 oncology patients attending seven district hospitals in the Vhembe district. Participants were recruited using purposive and convenience sampling. Data were collected using a structured self-report questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results Most participants were female (62%), aged ≥51 years (42%), had secondary education (84%), were unemployed (50.7%), and had no medical insurance (100%); 45.8% depended on social grants. Most participants were diagnosed with stage II (49.7%) or stage III (21.7%) cancer, and 75.8% had received at least two chemotherapy sessions. Fear of premature death was the most frequently reported concern following diagnosis (87.9%). Substantial biopsychosocial effects were reported, including negative impacts on social life (79.7%), financial status (74.8%), physical pain (76.4%), fatigue (72.9%), psychological well-being (72.9%), and emotional health (70.5%). Pain and discomfort were reported by 88.9% of participants. Significant associations were identified between cancer diagnosis and emotional/psychological distress (p < 0.02), loss of interest in daily activities among older patients (p < 0.02), and greater interference with social life among younger patients (p < 0.017). Fear of death (p < 0.033) and limited social support (p < 0.01–0.09 across variables) were also associated with emotional burden. Conclusion Oncology patients in rural Limpopo experience substantial biopsychosocial distress associated with advanced disease, socioeconomic vulnerability, and limited access to supportive oncology services. Integrating psychosocial care, palliative services, pain management, social support, and patient education into district-level oncology care is essential to improve quality of life and patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-026-06598-3
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional analysis of biopsychosocial distress among oncology patients in Limpopo, South Africa

Dorah Ursula Ramathuba, Maria Sonto Maputle, Takalani Friddah Rafundisani
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

A cross-sectional analysis of biopsychosocial distress among oncology patients in Limpopo, South Africa

Dorah Ursula Ramathuba, Maria Sonto Maputle, Takalani Friddah Rafundisani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cancer is a major global health burden associated with substantial mortality and long-term biopsychosocial challenges. In South Africa, limited oncology infrastructure and inequitable access to cancer care may contribute to delayed diagnosis and increased distress, particularly among patients in rural communities. This study assessed biopsychosocial distress among oncology patients in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Methods A non-experimental, cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study was conducted between October 2017 and January 2018 among 207 oncology patients attending seven district hospitals in the Vhembe district. Participants were recruited using purposive and convenience sampling. Data were collected using a structured self-report questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results Most participants were female (62%), aged ≥51 years (42%), had secondary education (84%), were unemployed (50.7%), and had no medical insurance (100%); 45.8% depended on social grants. Most participants were diagnosed with stage II (49.7%) or stage III (21.7%) cancer, and 75.8% had received at least two chemotherapy sessions. Fear of premature death was the most frequently reported concern following diagnosis (87.9%). Substantial biopsychosocial effects were reported, including negative impacts on social life (79.7%), financial status (74.8%), physical pain (76.4%), fatigue (72.9%), psychological well-being (72.9%), and emotional health (70.5%). Pain and discomfort were reported by 88.9% of participants. Significant associations were identified between cancer diagnosis and emotional/psychological distress (p < 0.02), loss of interest in daily activities among older patients (p < 0.02), and greater interference with social life among younger patients (p < 0.017). Fear of death (p < 0.033) and limited social support (p < 0.01–0.09 across variables) were also associated with emotional burden. Conclusion Oncology patients in rural Limpopo experience substantial biopsychosocial distress associated with advanced disease, socioeconomic vulnerability, and limited access to supportive oncology services. Integrating psychosocial care, palliative services, pain management, social support, and patient education into district-level oncology care is essential to improve quality of life and patient outcomes.

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
University of Venda (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.