Concept-Based Explainable AI in Retinal Imaging: Core Concepts, Techniques, and Challenges

In high-stakes domains like healthcare, establishing trust in AI-assisted decisions is critical for fostering confidence among experts and researchers. However, standard explanation methods may not fully meet clinical needs, offering raw data, such as saliency maps, rather than human-readable text and auditable, transparent reasoning. To bridge this gap, researchers are increasingly adopting concept-based approaches that express model reasoning through human-readable concepts grounded in expert-backed clinical knowledge. Although this field has advanced rapidly in recent years, retinal C-XAI remains methodologically heterogeneous, with limited agreement on taxonomy, evaluation, and clinical validation. This review identifies recurring reliability gaps in retinal C-XAI and synthesises potential directions for addressing them, including independent concept-level auditing, robustness testing, and clinician-informed validation. As an illustrative example, we discuss how the established SMILE methodology could be adapted for concept-level auditing in retinal C-XAI; this is presented as a candidate research direction rather than a new or clinically validated framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-026-02391-3
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concept-Based Explainable AI in Retinal Imaging: Core Concepts, Techniques, and Challenges

Koorosh Aslansefat, Tejal Shah, Zhibao Mian, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra et al.
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Concept-Based Explainable AI in Retinal Imaging: Core Concepts, Techniques, and Challenges

Koorosh Aslansefat, Tejal Shah, Zhibao Mian, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra, Mohadeseh Mollapour Papkyadeh, Mehran Hosseinalizadeh
article en

Abstract

In high-stakes domains like healthcare, establishing trust in AI-assisted decisions is critical for fostering confidence among experts and researchers. However, standard explanation methods may not fully meet clinical needs, offering raw data, such as saliency maps, rather than human-readable text and auditable, transparent reasoning. To bridge this gap, researchers are increasingly adopting concept-based approaches that express model reasoning through human-readable concepts grounded in expert-backed clinical knowledge. Although this field has advanced rapidly in recent years, retinal C-XAI remains methodologically heterogeneous, with limited agreement on taxonomy, evaluation, and clinical validation. This review identifies recurring reliability gaps in retinal C-XAI and synthesises potential directions for addressing them, including independent concept-level auditing, robustness testing, and clinician-informed validation. As an illustrative example, we discuss how the established SMILE methodology could be adapted for concept-level auditing in retinal C-XAI; this is presented as a candidate research direction rather than a new or clinically validated framework.

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
University of Hull (GB), College of Optometrists (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.