Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Visual–Inertial Navigation for Autonomous Lunar Surface Mobility: Systems, Datasets, Methods, and Open Challenges

Reliable onboard state estimation plays an important role in autonomous lunar surface mobility, given the lack of conventional global navigation satellite system (GNSS) coverage and the challenges of variable illumination and terrain texture. This review synthesizes model-based, learning-based, and hybrid visual–inertial odometry (VIO) approaches and assesses their relevance to lunar surface operations. The reviewed studies suggest that learned components can improve feature extraction, matching, depth estimation, and measurement confidence in selected datasets and operating conditions. However, representative lunar validation and uncertainty calibration remain limited. Given these limitations, hybrid architectures integrating learned components with explicit model-based estimators offer a comparatively testable design direction. Reduced lunar gravity alone does not render monocular scale unobservable; practical scale–bias performance also depends jointly on motion excitation, inertial quality, visual geometry, calibration, and estimation-window length. Stereo, wheel, crater, and map cues can provide additional metric information but introduce source-specific risks involving calibration, slip, association, and registration. Within the resources surveyed, we found no publicly available flight-derived lunar traverse dataset combining synchronized camera–IMU measurements, independent trajectory ground truth, and onboard timing. Evidence-based priorities include representative lunar validation, uncertainty-aware integration of learned components, consistency monitoring across metric sources, explicit estimator health and fallback mechanisms, and target-hardware resource evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13100929
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Visual–Inertial Navigation for Autonomous Lunar Surface Mobility: Systems, Datasets, Methods, and Open Challenges

C.K.M. Lee, Kai Leung Yung, Xiwei Bai, W.H. Ip et al.
Aerospace
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Visual–Inertial Navigation for Autonomous Lunar Surface Mobility: Systems, Datasets, Methods, and Open Challenges

C.K.M. Lee, Kai Leung Yung, Xiwei Bai, W.H. Ip, Kin lok Keung
article en

Abstract

Reliable onboard state estimation plays an important role in autonomous lunar surface mobility, given the lack of conventional global navigation satellite system (GNSS) coverage and the challenges of variable illumination and terrain texture. This review synthesizes model-based, learning-based, and hybrid visual–inertial odometry (VIO) approaches and assesses their relevance to lunar surface operations. The reviewed studies suggest that learned components can improve feature extraction, matching, depth estimation, and measurement confidence in selected datasets and operating conditions. However, representative lunar validation and uncertainty calibration remain limited. Given these limitations, hybrid architectures integrating learned components with explicit model-based estimators offer a comparatively testable design direction. Reduced lunar gravity alone does not render monocular scale unobservable; practical scale–bias performance also depends jointly on motion excitation, inertial quality, visual geometry, calibration, and estimation-window length. Stereo, wheel, crater, and map cues can provide additional metric information but introduce source-specific risks involving calibration, slip, association, and registration. Within the resources surveyed, we found no publicly available flight-derived lunar traverse dataset combining synchronized camera–IMU measurements, independent trajectory ground truth, and onboard timing. Evidence-based priorities include representative lunar validation, uncertainty-aware integration of learned components, consistency monitoring across metric sources, explicit estimator health and fallback mechanisms, and target-hardware resource evaluation.

AerospaceVol. 13(10)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.