Generating candidate items for a patient-reported outcome and experience measure for adults with peripheral intravenous catheters: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters are essential in modern healthcare, yet they are a common source of patient pain and distress, related to repeated failed insertion attempts, and subsequent device complications. Generic Patient Reported Outcome- and Experience- Measures poorly capture these impacts. We aimed to develop peripheral IV-specific tools to enhance patient-centred care and allow systematic measurement of future improvements. Methods A qualitative study, adhering to a PROM development process, was conducted between December 2022 and July 2023 at a quaternary hospital in Queensland, Australia. Initial item generation occurred through an expert clinician workshop ( n = 12) and five focus groups with 11 healthcare consumers. Structured interviews ( n = 10) were undertaken among key stakeholders for item refinement and content validity. Results The expert panel workshop participants generated preliminary items across experience and outcome domains. Consumer focus groups identified six experience domains, including ‘Pain and Discomfort’, ‘Education and Information’, ‘Distress and Worry’, ‘Staff Communication and Decision-Making’, ‘Regular Daily Activities’, and ‘Confidence and Safety’ and three outcome domains: ‘Future Healthcare Interactions’, ‘Physical and Emotional Harm’, and ‘Distress and Worry.’ Subsequently, 73 outcome and experience items were drafted; item refinement resulted in additional items, yielding a total of 106. Further (final) item refinement (incorporating changes following a confirmation process with participants) resulted in a final combined instrument of 109 items (86 experience; 23 outcome). Conclusion This study established foundational evidence to support development of validated, consumer‑informed PROMs and PREMs for peripheral IV insertion, care, and removal. By incorporating patient and clinician perspectives, the measures will support decision-making and enhance the consumer experience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01228-5
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating candidate items for a patient-reported outcome and experience measure for adults with peripheral intravenous catheters: a qualitative study

Claire M. Rickard, Nicole M. Marsh, Mary Fenn, Joshua Byrnes et al.
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Generating candidate items for a patient-reported outcome and experience measure for adults with peripheral intravenous catheters: a qualitative study

Claire M. Rickard, Nicole M. Marsh, Mary Fenn, Joshua Byrnes, Emily N. Larsen, Penelope Comans Inglis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters are essential in modern healthcare, yet they are a common source of patient pain and distress, related to repeated failed insertion attempts, and subsequent device complications. Generic Patient Reported Outcome- and Experience- Measures poorly capture these impacts. We aimed to develop peripheral IV-specific tools to enhance patient-centred care and allow systematic measurement of future improvements. Methods A qualitative study, adhering to a PROM development process, was conducted between December 2022 and July 2023 at a quaternary hospital in Queensland, Australia. Initial item generation occurred through an expert clinician workshop ( n = 12) and five focus groups with 11 healthcare consumers. Structured interviews ( n = 10) were undertaken among key stakeholders for item refinement and content validity. Results The expert panel workshop participants generated preliminary items across experience and outcome domains. Consumer focus groups identified six experience domains, including ‘Pain and Discomfort’, ‘Education and Information’, ‘Distress and Worry’, ‘Staff Communication and Decision-Making’, ‘Regular Daily Activities’, and ‘Confidence and Safety’ and three outcome domains: ‘Future Healthcare Interactions’, ‘Physical and Emotional Harm’, and ‘Distress and Worry.’ Subsequently, 73 outcome and experience items were drafted; item refinement resulted in additional items, yielding a total of 106. Further (final) item refinement (incorporating changes following a confirmation process with participants) resulted in a final combined instrument of 109 items (86 experience; 23 outcome). Conclusion This study established foundational evidence to support development of validated, consumer‑informed PROMs and PREMs for peripheral IV insertion, care, and removal. By incorporating patient and clinician perspectives, the measures will support decision-making and enhance the consumer experience.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.