Cystic–solid ADC difference on MRI for differentiating seromucinous borderline tumor from endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer

Background Seromucinous borderline tumor (SMBT) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) may show overlapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging may improve their preoperative differentiation. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the cystic–solid apparent diffusion coefficient difference (ΔADC) for differentiating SMBT from EAOC. Material and Methods This retrospective single-center study included 49 patients with pathologically confirmed SMBT (n = 14) or EAOC (n = 35) who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in the cystic and solid components, and ΔADC was calculated as cystic ADC minus solid ADC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed with EAOC as the positive outcome. Results SMBT showed lower cystic ADC values and higher solid ADC values than EAOC, resulting in a smaller ΔADC. ΔADC and solid ADC yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.924 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.817–1.000) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.837–1.000), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.862). At the internally derived ΔADC cutoff of 0.529 ×10 −3 mm 2 /s, sensitivity was 94.3% (95% CI 80.8–99.3) and specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 66.1–99.8); because the cutoff was derived and evaluated in the same cohort, these performance estimates may be optimistic. Conclusion ΔADC showed high diagnostic performance for differentiating SMBT from EAOC, but incremental diagnostic performance over solid ADC was not demonstrated. The internally derived cutoff and associated performance estimates require independent multicenter validation before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Radiologica
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851261495789
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cystic–solid ADC difference on MRI for differentiating seromucinous borderline tumor from endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer

Masanori Ishida, Motoki Nakaï, Hirotaka Nishi, Yukari Wakabayashi et al.
Acta Radiologica
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Cystic–solid ADC difference on MRI for differentiating seromucinous borderline tumor from endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer

Masanori Ishida, Motoki Nakaï, Hirotaka Nishi, Yukari Wakabayashi, Yoichi Araki, Kazuhiro Saito, Elly Arizono, Akihiko Hayakawa, Akitoshi Kanagawa, Shigehiro Hayashi
article en

Abstract

Background Seromucinous borderline tumor (SMBT) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) may show overlapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging may improve their preoperative differentiation. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the cystic–solid apparent diffusion coefficient difference (ΔADC) for differentiating SMBT from EAOC. Material and Methods This retrospective single-center study included 49 patients with pathologically confirmed SMBT (n = 14) or EAOC (n = 35) who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in the cystic and solid components, and ΔADC was calculated as cystic ADC minus solid ADC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed with EAOC as the positive outcome. Results SMBT showed lower cystic ADC values and higher solid ADC values than EAOC, resulting in a smaller ΔADC. ΔADC and solid ADC yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.924 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.817–1.000) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.837–1.000), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.862). At the internally derived ΔADC cutoff of 0.529 ×10 −3 mm 2 /s, sensitivity was 94.3% (95% CI 80.8–99.3) and specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 66.1–99.8); because the cutoff was derived and evaluated in the same cohort, these performance estimates may be optimistic. Conclusion ΔADC showed high diagnostic performance for differentiating SMBT from EAOC, but incremental diagnostic performance over solid ADC was not demonstrated. The internally derived cutoff and associated performance estimates require independent multicenter validation before clinical application.

Acta Radiologica
Tokyo Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.