Examining the Gap between Work-Warranted and Actual Use of Screen Reading Software by Visually Impaired

Introduction: Research on assistive technology (AT) has focused on adoption and abandonment. Little is known about whether people who use screen-reading software (SRS) use it to the extent their work requires. This study examined the gap between work-warranted and actual SRS use and how it varies with profile and SRS-use characteristics. Methods: A total of 338 SRS users in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, India, rated how far their work warranted SRS use and how far they actually used it. Comparing the two ratings, respondents were classified as Requirement-Matched, Above-Requirement or Below-Requirement Users. Associations with 13 characteristics were tested using Pearson chi-square, Monte Carlo exact tests and Cramér's V. Results: Most respondents (76.6%) were Requirement-Matched Users, 13.6% were Above-Requirement Users and 9.8% were Below-Requirement Users. Eagerness to learn about AT showed the strongest association (V = .26), with low eagerness linked to below-requirement use. Below-requirement use was also more frequent among respondents with 2–5 years of AT use, a single training programme, a diploma qualification and NVDA as their screen reader. Above-requirement use was more frequent among respondents aged 18–25, students and those with moderate visual impairment. Gender, income, cause of impairment and self-rated computer proficiency were not associated with the gap. Discussion: The two forms of mismatch have different correlates. Below-requirement use appears to reflect a plateau in learning rather than weak general computer skill. Implications for Practitioners: Training providers could follow introductory SRS training with a second, work-focused stage. Employers and rehabilitation services could offer refresher training to users in their second to fifth year of AT use. Conflict of Interest: There is no conflict of interest Ethical Clearance: Ethical clearance obtained from Pondicherry University. Keywords: Visually Impaired; Above-Requirement Users; Below-Requirement Users; Requirement-Matched Users

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sociology and Social Research
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64823/ijssr.2601005
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Gap between Work-Warranted and Actual Use of Screen Reading Software by Visually Impaired

G. Madan Mohan, vigneshwaran k
International Journal of Sociology and Social Research
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Examining the Gap between Work-Warranted and Actual Use of Screen Reading Software by Visually Impaired

G. Madan Mohan, vigneshwaran k
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Research on assistive technology (AT) has focused on adoption and abandonment. Little is known about whether people who use screen-reading software (SRS) use it to the extent their work requires. This study examined the gap between work-warranted and actual SRS use and how it varies with profile and SRS-use characteristics. Methods: A total of 338 SRS users in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, India, rated how far their work warranted SRS use and how far they actually used it. Comparing the two ratings, respondents were classified as Requirement-Matched, Above-Requirement or Below-Requirement Users. Associations with 13 characteristics were tested using Pearson chi-square, Monte Carlo exact tests and Cramér's V. Results: Most respondents (76.6%) were Requirement-Matched Users, 13.6% were Above-Requirement Users and 9.8% were Below-Requirement Users. Eagerness to learn about AT showed the strongest association (V = .26), with low eagerness linked to below-requirement use. Below-requirement use was also more frequent among respondents with 2–5 years of AT use, a single training programme, a diploma qualification and NVDA as their screen reader. Above-requirement use was more frequent among respondents aged 18–25, students and those with moderate visual impairment. Gender, income, cause of impairment and self-rated computer proficiency were not associated with the gap. Discussion: The two forms of mismatch have different correlates. Below-requirement use appears to reflect a plateau in learning rather than weak general computer skill. Implications for Practitioners: Training providers could follow introductory SRS training with a second, work-focused stage. Employers and rehabilitation services could offer refresher training to users in their second to fifth year of AT use. Conflict of Interest: There is no conflict of interest Ethical Clearance: Ethical clearance obtained from Pondicherry University. Keywords: Visually Impaired; Above-Requirement Users; Below-Requirement Users; Requirement-Matched Users

International Journal of Sociology and Social ResearchVol. 1(2)
Pondicherry University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.