Validation of a Low-Cost Surgical Simulation Model for Cleft Lip Repair Training: A Multicentre Trainer–Trainee Workshop Study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the face, content and construct validity of a low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer through a multicentre trainee-trainer workshop.DesignProspective multicentre validation study.SettingThree accredited plastic surgery training centres.Patients/ParticipantsSixty-two plastic surgery residents participated in standardised simulation workshops.InterventionsParticipants underwent lectures, video demonstrations and supervised practice of unilateral cleft lip repair using the low-cost simulator. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires assessed self-reported knowledge and procedural understanding. Participants rated the model for face and content validity using a 5-point Likert scale. Faculty assessed simulator-based performance using a 10-point checklist.Main Outcome Measure(s)Face validity, content validity, construct validity, pre- and post-workshop knowledge scores, repair time, suture-line integrity and lip-height symmetry.ResultsKnowledge scores increased from 55% to 87%, with significant improvement in chronological recall of repair steps (P < .001). Face validity exceeded 90% across anatomical and procedural domains, with teaching usefulness rated highest (98%). Content validity was strongly supported, with 99% of participants recommending curriculum integration. Construct validity demonstrated significant discrimination between first-, second- and third-year residents, with mean performance scores of 7.1, 8.4 and 9.6, respectively (P < .001). Repair times decreased with increasing training level, while senior trainees achieved superior repair quality.ConclusionsThe low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer demonstrated favourable face, content and construct validity within a structured workshop setting. Its affordability and reproducibility support its use as an adjunct for procedural rehearsal and assessment in plastic surgery training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261495084
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a Low-Cost Surgical Simulation Model for Cleft Lip Repair Training: A Multicentre Trainer–Trainee Workshop Study

Peter A. W. H. Kessler, Smruti Srinivasan, Konstanze Scheller, Devi Prasad Mohapatra et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Validation of a Low-Cost Surgical Simulation Model for Cleft Lip Repair Training: A Multicentre Trainer–Trainee Workshop Study

Peter A. W. H. Kessler, Smruti Srinivasan, Konstanze Scheller, Devi Prasad Mohapatra, Madhubari Vathulya, Hemanth Kumar K
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the face, content and construct validity of a low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer through a multicentre trainee-trainer workshop.DesignProspective multicentre validation study.SettingThree accredited plastic surgery training centres.Patients/ParticipantsSixty-two plastic surgery residents participated in standardised simulation workshops.InterventionsParticipants underwent lectures, video demonstrations and supervised practice of unilateral cleft lip repair using the low-cost simulator. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires assessed self-reported knowledge and procedural understanding. Participants rated the model for face and content validity using a 5-point Likert scale. Faculty assessed simulator-based performance using a 10-point checklist.Main Outcome Measure(s)Face validity, content validity, construct validity, pre- and post-workshop knowledge scores, repair time, suture-line integrity and lip-height symmetry.ResultsKnowledge scores increased from 55% to 87%, with significant improvement in chronological recall of repair steps (P < .001). Face validity exceeded 90% across anatomical and procedural domains, with teaching usefulness rated highest (98%). Content validity was strongly supported, with 99% of participants recommending curriculum integration. Construct validity demonstrated significant discrimination between first-, second- and third-year residents, with mean performance scores of 7.1, 8.4 and 9.6, respectively (P < .001). Repair times decreased with increasing training level, while senior trainees achieved superior repair quality.ConclusionsThe low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer demonstrated favourable face, content and construct validity within a structured workshop setting. Its affordability and reproducibility support its use as an adjunct for procedural rehearsal and assessment in plastic surgery training.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), University Hospital in Halle (DE), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh (IN), Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.